Abstract:Background: To better understand the underlying mechanisms involved in trunk motion during a tennis serve, this study aimed to examine the (1) relative motion of the middle and lower trunk and (2) lower trunk muscle activity during three different types of tennis serves - flat, topspin, and slice. Methods: Tennis serves performed by 11 advanced (AV) and 8 advanced intermediate (AI) male tennis players were videorecorded with markers placed on the back of the subject used to estimate the anatomical joint (AJ) angles between the middle and lower trunk for four trunk motions (extension, left lateral flexion, and left and right twisting). Surface electromyographic (EMG) techniques were used to monitor the left and right rectus abdominis (LRA and RRA), external oblique (LEO and REO), internal oblique (LIO and RIO), and erector spinae (LES and RES). The maximal AJ angles for different trunk motions during a serve and the average EMG levels for different muscles during different phases (ascending and descending windup, acceleration, and follow-through) of a tennis serve were evaluated. Results: The repeated measures Skill x Serve Type x Trunk Motion ANOVA for maximal AJ angle indicated no significant main effects for serve type or skill level. However, the AV group had significantly smaller extension (p = 0.018) and greater left lateral flexion (p = 0.038) angles than the AI group. The repeated measures Skill x Serve Type x Phase MANOVA revealed significant phase main effects in all muscles (p < 0.001) and the average EMG of the AV group for LRA was significantly higher than that of the AI group (p = 0.008). All muscles showed their highest EMG values during the acceleration phase. LRA and LEO muscles also exhibited high activations during the descending windup phase, and RES muscle was very active during the follow-through phase. Conclusion: Subjects in the AI group may be more susceptible to back injury than the AV group because of the significantly greater trunk hyperextension, and relatively large lumbar spinal loads are expected during the acceleration phase because of the hyperextension posture and profound front-back and bilateral co-activations in lower trunk muscles.

MUSCLE ACTIVATION DURING FOREHAND AND BACKHAND DRIVES IN THE SPORT DISCIPLINE OF TENNIS

Performance factors related to the different tennis backhand groundstrokes: a review

Injury Occurrence and Localization in Tennis: Perspectives on Prevention and Physiotherapy

Lower Limb Biomechanics during the Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis: A Systemic Review

The Musculoskeletal Health Benefits of Tennis

Muscle activation in coupled scapulohumeral motions in the high performance tennis serve

APPLICATION OF STATE-OF-THE-ART COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TO STRENGTH TRAINING IN TENNIS INSTRUCTION

Does the Kinetic Chain Work in the Forehand Drive Open Stance? What Electromyographic Analysis of the latissimus Dorsi and the Posterior Deltoid Muscles Showed Us

Relationship between muscle coordination and racket mass during forehand drive in tennis

A DESCRIPTIVE PROFILE OF ISOMETRIC MUSCLE STRENGTH AND MUSCLE STRENGTH IMBALANCE IN YOUNG TENNIS PLAYERS

Biomechanical analyses of different serve and groundstroke techniques in tennis: A systematic scoping review

KINEMATICS ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY DURING THE TWO-HANDED BACKHAND GROUNDER STROKE AND DRIVE VOLLEY FOR TENNIS PLAYERS

Lower trunk kinematics and muscle activity during different types of tennis serves

UPPER LIMB MOVEMENT CHARACTERISTICS IN VOLLEYBALL ATHLETES

Risk Factors for Upper Limb Injury in Tennis Players: A Systematic Review

Shoulder Torque Production and Muscular Balance after Long and Short Tennis Points

Does stroke performance in amateur tennis players depend on functional power generating capacity?

Lower trunk muscle activity during the tennis serve

IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS' TENNIS SKILLS BASED ON HITTING STRENGTH TRAINING

Mechanical Analysis on Tennis Forehand Drive

ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL TRAINING ON PHYSICAL FITNESS IN COLLEGE TENNIS PLAYERS