Abstract:Background The novel coronavirus, also known as SARS-CoV-2, has come to define much of our lives since the beginning of 2020. During this time, countries around the world imposed lockdowns and social distancing measures. The physical movements of people ground to a halt, while their online interactions increased as they turned to engaging with each other virtually. As the means of communication shifted online, information consumption also shifted online. Governing authorities and health agencies have intentionally shifted their focus to use social media and online platforms to spread factual and timely information. However, this has also opened the gate for misinformation, contributing to and accelerating the phenomenon of misinfodemics. Objective We carried out an analysis of Twitter discourse on over 1 billion tweets related to COVID-19 over a year to identify and investigate prevalent misinformation narratives and trends. We also aimed to describe the Twitter audience that is more susceptible to health-related misinformation and the network mechanisms driving misinfodemics. Methods We leveraged a data set that we collected and made public, which contained over 1 billion tweets related to COVID-19 between January 2020 and April 2021. We created a subset of this larger data set by isolating tweets that included URLs with domains that had been identified by Media Bias/Fact Check as being prone to questionable and misinformation content. By leveraging clustering and topic modeling techniques, we identified major narratives, including health misinformation and conspiracies, which were present within this subset of tweets. Results Our focus was on a subset of 12,689,165 tweets that we determined were representative of COVID-19 misinformation narratives in our full data set. When analyzing tweets that shared content from domains known to be questionable or that promoted misinformation, we found that a few key misinformation narratives emerged about hydroxychloroquine and alternative medicines, US officials and governing agencies, and COVID-19 prevention measures. We further analyzed the misinformation retweet network and found that users who shared both questionable and conspiracy-related content were clustered more closely in the network than others, supporting the hypothesis that echo chambers can contribute to the spread of health misinfodemics. Conclusions We presented a summary and analysis of the major misinformation discourse surrounding COVID-19 and those who promoted and engaged with it. While misinformation is not limited to social media platforms, we hope that our insights, particularly pertaining to health-related emergencies, will help pave the way for computational infodemiology to inform health surveillance and interventions.

New mental costumes: Leveraging ACRL’s value of information frame in dealing with infodemics in a post-truth era

Conspiracy theories, misinformation, disinformation and the coronavirus: A burgeoning of post-truth in the social media

Understanding the "Infodemic" Threat: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Who do you trust? The digital destruction of shared situational awareness and the COVID-19 infodemic

Understanding patterns of COVID infodemic: A systematic and pragmatic approach to curb fake news

Addressing Viral Medical Rumors and False or Misleading Information

Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the COVID-19 infodemic

Fake news in a time of plague: Exploring individuals' online information management in the COVID-19 era

Lessons Learned From Interdisciplinary Efforts to Combat COVID-19 Misinformation: Development of Agile Integrative Methods From Behavioral Science, Data Science, and Implementation Science

Infodemics: A new challenge for public health

Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration.

Epistemic responsibilities in the COVID-19 pandemic: Is a digital infosphere a friend or a foe?

Social histories of public health misinformation and infodemics: case studies of four pandemics

The social media Infodemic of health-related misinformation and technical solutions.

How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management

Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagment with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19

Strengthening scientific credibility against misinformation and disinformation: Where do we stand now?

Navigating the infodemic: A qualitative study of university students’ information strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Charting the Information and Misinformation Landscape to Characterize Misinfodemics on Social Media: COVID-19 Infodemiology Study at a Planetary Scale

Battling the coronavirus 'infodemic' among social media users in Kenya and Nigeria

How the Field of Infectious Diseases Can Leverage Digital Strategy and Social Media Use During a Pandemic