Abstract:Ocular position drifts during gaze fixation are significantly less well-understood than microsaccades. We recently identified a short-latency ocular position drift response, of approximately 1 min arc amplitude, that is triggered within <100 ms by visual onsets. This systematic eye movement response is feature-tuned and seems to be coordinated with a simultaneous resetting of the saccadic system by visual stimuli. However, much remains to be learned about the drift response, especially for designing better-informed neurophysiological experiments unraveling its mechanistic substrates. Here we systematically tested multiple new feature tuning properties of drift responses. Using highly precise eye tracking in three male rhesus macaque monkeys, we found that drift responses still occur for tiny foveal visual stimuli. Moreover, the responses exhibit size tuning, scaling their amplitude (both up and down) as a function of stimulus size, and they also possess a monotonically increasing contrast sensitivity curve. Importantly, short-latency drift responses still occur for small peripheral visual targets, which additionally introduce spatially-directed modulations in drift trajectories towards the appearing peripheral stimuli. Drift responses also remain predominantly upward even for stimuli exclusively located in the lower visual field, and even when starting gaze position is upward. When we checked the timing of drift responses, we found that it was better synchronized to stimulus-induced saccadic inhibition than to stimulus onset. These results, along with a suppression of drift response amplitudes by peri-stimulus saccades, suggest that drift responses reflect the rapid impacts of short-latency and feature-tuned visual neural activity on final oculomotor control circuitry in the brain. Significance statement During gaze fixation, the eye drifts slowly in between microsaccades. While eye position drifts are not entirely random, they remain to be significantly more enigmatic than microsaccades, and they are typically mathematically modeled as random walk processes. Having recently found that these eye movements are systematically modulated with very short latencies by some stimulus onsets, here we characterized the feature-tuning properties of such stimulus-driven drift responses. Our results suggest that drift eye movements reflect the impacts of short-latency sensory signals on the oculomotor system. These results also demonstrate that visual stimuli can impact drift eye movements in a manner similar to how such stimuli impact microsaccades.

Fixational eye movements depend on task and target

Fixational eye movements in passive versus active sustained fixation tasks

Scaling of Horizontal and Vertical Fixational Eye Movements.

[The Progress of Fixation Eye Movement Research].

Fixational eye movements as active sensation for high visual acuity

Analysis of fixation patterns among glaucoma patients using a superfast eye tracking system

Control of fixation duration during visual search task execution

Extracting Information Of Fixational Eye Movements Through Pupil Tracking

Different temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual processing during fixation

Effects of post-saccadic oscillations on visual processing times

Fixational Eye Movements Act More Globally when Seeing Locally: A Motion-Integration Perspective

Consequences of eye movements for spatial selectivity

Fixational Saccadic Eye Movements Are Altered in Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Spiral scanning improves subject fixation in widefield retinal imaging

Fixation Drift Increases as a Function of Time-on-Task

Visual feature tuning properties of short-latency stimulus-driven ocular position drift responses during gaze fixation

Strategies for enhancing automatic fixation detection in head-mounted eye tracking

Evidence for five types of fixation during a random saccade eye tracking task: Implications for the study of oculomotor fatigue

Characterization and Analysis of Retinal Axial Motion at High Spatiotemporal Resolution and Its Implication for Real-Time Correction in Human Retinal Imaging

Evidence for five types of fixation during a random saccade eye tracking task and changes in fixation duration as a function of time-on-task

Ongoing Cognitive Processing Influences Precise Eye-Movement Targets in Reading