Abstract:Abstract Local excitatory connections in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) are stronger and more prevalent between neurons that share similar functional response features. However, the details of how functional rules for local connectivity shape neuronal responses in V1 remain unknown. We hypothesised that complex responses to visual stimuli may arise as a consequence of rules for selective excitatory connectivity within the local network in the superficial layers of mouse V1. In mouse V1 many neurons respond to overlapping grating stimuli (plaid stimuli) with highly selective and facilitatory responses, which are not simply predicted by responses to single gratings presented alone. This complexity is surprising, since excitatory neurons in V1 are considered to be mainly tuned to single preferred orientations. Here we examined the consequences for visual processing of two alternative connectivity schemes: in the first case, local connections are aligned with visual properties inherited from feedforward input (a ‘like-to-like’ scheme specifically connecting neurons that share similar preferred orientations); in the second case, local connections group neurons into excitatory subnetworks that combine and amplify multiple feedforward visual properties (a ‘feature binding’ scheme) . By comparing predictions from large scale computational models with in vivo recordings of visual representations in mouse V1, we found that responses to plaid stimuli were best explained by a assuming ‘feature binding’ connectivity. Unlike under the ‘like-to-like’ scheme, selective amplification within feature-binding excitatory subnetworks replicated experimentally observed facilitatory responses to plaid stimuli; explained selective plaid responses not predicted by grating selectivity; and was consistent with broad anatomical selectivity observed in mouse V1. Our results show that visual feature binding can occur through local recurrent mechanisms without requiring feedforward convergence, and that such a mechanism is consistent with visual responses and cortical anatomy in mouse V1. Author summary The brain is a highly complex structure, with abundant connectivity between nearby neurons in the neocortex, the outermost and evolutionarily most recent part of the brain. Although the network architecture of the neocortex can appear disordered, connections between neurons seem to follow certain rules. These rules most likely determine how information flows through the neural circuits of the brain, but the relationship between particular connectivity rules and the function of the cortical network is not known. We built models of visual cortex in the mouse, assuming distinct rules for connectivity, and examined how the various rules changed the way the models responded to visual stimuli. We also recorded responses to visual stimuli of populations of neurons in anaesthetised mice, and compared these responses with our model predictions. We found that connections in neocortex probably follow a connectivity rule that groups together neurons that differ in simple visual properties, to build more complex representations of visual stimuli. This finding is surprising because primary visual cortex is assumed to support mainly simple visual representations. We show that including specific rules for non-random connectivity in cortical models, and precisely measuring those rules in cortical tissue, is essential to understanding how information is processed by the brain.

Feature selectivity explains mismatch signals in mouse visual cortex

Spatiotemporal dynamics across visual cortical laminae support a predictive coding framework for interpreting mismatch responses

Multimodal mismatch responses in mouse auditory cortex

Learning to segment self-generated from externally caused optic flow through sensorimotor mismatch circuits

Expectation violations enhance neuronal encoding of sensory information in mouse primary visual cortex

Experience-dependent predictions of feedforward and contextual information in mouse visual cortex

Expectation violations produce error signals in mouse V1

Stimulus history, not expectation, drives sensory prediction errors in mammalian cortex

Violated predictions enhance the representational fidelity of visual features in perception

Mesoscale cortical dynamics reflect the interaction of sensory evidence and temporal expectation during perceptual decision-making

Top-down modulation of sensory processing and mismatch in the mouse posterior parietal cortex

Feature selectivity of corticocortical feedback along the primate dorsal visual pathway

Erasing motion: Scrambling direction selectivity in visual cortex during saccades

Pattern and Component Motion Selectivity in Cortical Area Pmls of the Cat

Distinguishing externally from saccade-induced motion in visual cortex

Stimulus-specific prediction error neurons in mouse auditory cortex

Sensory experience steers representational drift in mouse visual cortex

Cooperative thalamocortical circuit mechanism for sensory prediction errors

Learned response dynamics reflect stimulus timing and encode temporal expectation violations in superficial layers of mouse V1

Specific excitatory connectivity for feature integration in mouse primary visual cortex

Contralateral Bias of High Spatial Frequency Tuning and Cardinal Direction Selectivity in Mouse Visual Cortex