Abstract:States are key actors in global health governance, particularly in the prevention and control of infectious diseases. The emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in recent decades pose profound challenges to global health security. As the first coronavirus pandemic, the COVID-19 caused significant damage worldwide, but responses and outcomes varied greatly among states. Using COVID-19 as an example, this study aims to compare the policies and measures implemented by different states during the COVID-19 pandemic and to synthesize experiences to strengthen global health governance for future infectious disease crises. We used Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework and PRISMA methodology was used for literature search and decision on relevant studies. English databases were searched using combinations of keywords and articles examining COVID-19 prevention and control policies in representative countries were included. A comparative analysis across these four states (United States, Sweden, India, and Nigeria) was then conducted to analyse the differences, rationale, and challenges of the approaches taken by these states. A total of 36 studies were included in the analysis. The management of the COVID-19 by states is divided into two main categories: domestic governance and international governance. Domestically, the United States and India have taken more measures, yet notable disparities in infection source control, transmission interruption, vulnerable population protection, collaborative governance, and so on were observed among all four states. Globally, the United States and Sweden were more proactive in international governance, and all four states have variations in their adherence to global regulations, information sharing, resource distribution, and cooperative engagement. Significant disparities occurred during the response to early COVID-19 in four states, which may be due to differences in politics, economy, and culture. To prevent and mitigate the impact of infectious diseases, states should, in future, prioritize solidarity and cooperation, and improve governance domestically and internationally based on national contexts and global health principles.

Multi-Level Governance, Policy Coordination and Subnational Responses to COVID-19: Comparing China and the US

Comparative analysis of state-level policy responses in global health governance: A scoping review using COVID-19 as a case

Governing public health emergencies during the coronavirus disease outbreak: Lessons from four Chinese cities in the first wave

Crisis coordination in centralized regimes: Explaining china's strategy for combatting the COVID-19 pandemic

Governance Capability of the Public Health System: A Comparative Analysis of the Control of COVID-19 in the Different Provinces of China

Collaborative Neighborhood Governance and Its Effectiveness in Community Mitigation to COVID-19 Pandemic: from the Perspective of Community Workers in Six Chinese Cities

A Fuzzy-Set Configurational Examination of Governance Capability under Certainty and Uncertainty Conditions: Evidence from the Chinese Provincial Cases of Early COVID-19 Containing Practice

Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution

Joining Hands to Manage Transboundary Crises: A Comparative Evaluation of Policy Collaboration for Epidemic Prevention in China during SARS and COVID-19

Achieving the Transition from Collective Cognition to Collective Action in Responding to COVID-19 in China

Assessment of Resilient Governance Capacity Toward COVID-19 in Chinese Cities

How local governments balance multiple agendas in small-scale outbreaks responses: A multi-case comparative study from four major cities in China

Characterizing the Patterns of China's Policies Against COVID-19: A Bibliometric Study.

Towards a constructed order of co-governance: Understanding the state–society dynamics of neighbourhood collaborative responses to COVID-19 in urban China

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Novel virus, novel response: Local discretion and responses to COVID-19 in Hebei Province, China

Crisis governance, Chinese style: distinctive features of China’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic

Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities

Neighborhood governance and residents' satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in urban China: evidence from six major Chinese cities

Regional differences of COVID-19 pandemic prevention in China: Especially from the perspective of political leaders

Governing pandemics: Resilience and community responses for COVID-19 in Bengaluru and Shanghai