A Test of the Peak-End Rule in Retrospective Evaluation on Extended Experiences
Geng Xiaowei,Zheng Quanquan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2011.01.037
IF: 10.172
2011-01-01
Psychological Science
Abstract:The peak-end rule posits that people often make retrospective evaluation of an extended experience based on their most extreme affect experienced during an event(i.e.,peak affect) and near its end(i.e.,end affect)(Kahneman,1993).Among the studies on which the peak-end rule based(Fredrickson and Kahneman,1993;Schreiber and Kahneman,2000;Redelmeier and Kahneman,1996),the duration of various experiences was not longer than several weeks.However,in real life many retrospective evaluations on extended experiences are made much later.So,people wonder whether the peak-end rule is right for retrospective evaluation over a long time According to the Accessibility Model of Emotional Self-Report(Robinson & Clore,2002),we supposed that the peak-end rule was right for retrospective evaluation over a short time,but not for retrospective evaluation overa long time. Two experiments were made to test the peak-end rule in retrospective evaluation on extended experiences.In Experiment 1,according to Fredrickson and Kahneman s study in 1993,40 subjects viewed six aversive film clips and six pleasant ones that varied in duration and intensity.They provided real-time ratings of affect during each clip and global evaluations of each clip when it was over on the seven-point scale.Partial correlation analysis was made of the relationship between the global evaluation and real-time evaluation,and showed that the retrospective evaluation on both positive and negative film clips was significantly influenced by the peak and end affect of experience,but not by the duration of experience.In Experiment 2,72 subjects who have experienced the seven-day Golden Week were asked to report their happiness at the end of each day during the holiday and give three retrospective evaluations of the experience of the holiday respectively at the end of the holiday,three weeks later,seven weeks later on the seven-point scale.Regression analysis was made of the relationship between three retrospective evaluations and real-time evaluation and showed that the peak-end rule was right for the retrospective evaluation of hedonic experience at the end of the Golden Week and three week later,but not for the retrospective evaluation seven week later.In sum,we could conclude that the peak-end rule was right for retrospective evaluation of hedonic experience over a short time,but not for the retrospective evaluation of hedonic experience over a long time.The present findings are important to exploring the mechanism of retrospective experience evaluation and also have important practical implications in the field of marketing.For consumers to make higher retrospective evaluation of the extended experience of using products, marketers should design service programs according to the rule of retrospective evaluation.