Abstract:The development of sequence decomposition techniques in recent years has facilitated the wide use of decomposition-based prediction models in hydrological forecasting. However, decomposition-based prediction models usually use the overall decomposition (OD) sampling technique to extract samples. Some studies have shown that the OD sampling technique causes abnormally “high” performance of models owing to the utilization of future information, and this technique cannot be applied in practice. Several researchers have also proposed novel sampling techniques, such as semi-stepwise decomposition (SSD), fully stepwise decomposition (FSD), and single-model SSD (SMSSD). Moreover, an improved single-model FSD (SMFSD) sampling technique is proposed in this study. Four decomposition methods, namely discrete wavelet transform (DWT), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), and variational mode decomposition (VMD), are introduced in this study. A systematic investigation of the models developed using OD sampling techniques is conducted, and the applicability of SSD, FSD, SMSSD, and SMFSD sampling techniques is reasonably evaluated. The application of monthly runoff prediction using the five sampling techniques and four decomposition methods at five representative hydrological stations in Poyang Lake, China, shows that (1) EMD and CEEMDAN (including the improved EMD-based adaptive decomposition method) cannot be used to construct stepwise decomposition prediction models because the implementation of the stepwise decomposition strategy leads to a variable number of sub-series. (2) OD sampling techniques cannot develop convincing models for practical prediction because future information is introduced into the samples for model training. (3) Models developed based on SSD and SMSSD sampling techniques do not use future information in the training process, but suffer from severe overfitting and inferior prediction performance. (4) Models developed based on FSD and SMFSD sampling techniques can produce convincing prediction results, and the combination of the proposed SMFSD sampling technique and VMD develops prediction models with superior performance and significantly enhances the efficiency of the models.

Decompositions of Taylor diagram and DISO performance criteria

DISO: A rethink of Taylor diagram

Short communication comments on ‘DISO: A rethink of Taylor diagram’

Improved Data Splitting Methods for Data-Driven Hydrological Model Development Based on a Large Number of Catchment Samples

A new diagram for performance evaluation of complex models

CCHZ‐DISO: A Timely New Assessment System for data quality or model performance from Da Dao Zhi Jian

Evaluation of Metrics for Assessing Dipolar Climate Patterns in Climate Models

Toward robust pattern similarity metric for distributed model evaluation

Towards a generic model evaluation metric for non-normally distributed measurements in water quality and ecosystem models

On a Structural Similarity Index Approach for Floating-Point Data

Application of Taylor diagram in the evaluation of joint environmental distributions' performances

Developing a Dual Entropy-Transinformation Criterion for Hydrometric Network Optimization Based on Information Theory and Copulas.

Adding Method of Delta-Four-stream Spherical Harmonic Expansion Approximation for Infrared Radiative Transfer Parameterization

Dissimilarity Analytics for Monitoring of Nonstationary Industrial Processes with Stationary Subspace Decomposition

Exploratory precipitation metrics: spatiotemporal characteristics, process-oriented, and phenomena-based

Evaluation of NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 in simulation performance and drought capture utility over China – based on DISO

The ARM Data-Oriented Metrics and Diagnostics Package for Climate Models A New Tool for Evaluating Climate Models with Field Data

Comparing Flow Duration Curves and Discharge Hydrographs to Assess Eco-flows

Can Sampling Techniques Improve the Performance of Decomposition-Based Hydrological Prediction Models? Exploration of Some Comparative Experiments

TSDDISCOVER: Discovering Data Dependency for Time Series Data

An Adaptive DISSIM Algorithm for Statistical Process Monitoring