Abstract:This study examined whether there are neural markers of individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity and whether these differences are only manifest when performing a demanding WM task or at all levels of difficulty. Each subject's WM capacity was estimated using a modified digit span task prior to participation in an N-back task that varied difficulty from 1- to 4-back. While performing the N-back task, subjects wore scalp electrodes that allowed measurement of both event-related potentials (ERP) and event-related synchronization and desynchronization (ERS/ERD). Those subjects classified as low WM were more affected by the higher cognitive demands (many more errors in the 4-back task and generally slower responses) than those classified as high WM. These behavioral differences between the two groups were also apparent in the neural markers. Specifically, low WM subjects, when compared with high WM subjects, produced smaller P300 amplitudes and theta ERS, as well as greater alpha ER]) at the most difficult level. Importantly, the observed differences in electrophysiological responses between the two groups were also observed at the lowest difficulty level, not just when the task challenged WM capacity. In addition, P300 amplitudes and alpha ERD responses were found to correlate with individual WM capacities independent of the task difficulty. These results suggest that there are qualitative neural differences among individuals with different WM capacities when approaching cognitive operations. Individuals with high WM capacities may make more efficient use of neural resources to keep their attention focused on the task-relevant information when performing cognitive tasks. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Working Memory Capacity For Faces With Different Levels of Emotional Valence

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

The Impact of Visual Working Memory Capacity on the Filtering Efficiency of Emotional Face Distractors.

Trading Capacity for Precision in Working Memory: Reviving the Effect of Negative Emotion on Working Memory

Affective bias in visual working memory is associated with capacity

Emotional content effects the precision of visual working memory

Visual Working Memory Representations Guide the Detection of Emotional Faces: an ERP Study

Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions.

Working Memory Capacity of Biological Movements Predicts Empathy Traits

Effect of negative emotional stimuli on working memory: Impact of voluntary and automatic attention

Working memory capacity predicts human emotion evaluation: Evidence from event-related potentials

The effects of emotion on working memory: Valence versus motivation

Visual Short-Term Memory Load Modulates the Early Attention and Perception of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Faces

Affective Modulation of Working Memory Maintenance: The Role of Positive and Negative Emotions

Emotional States Affect the Retention of Biological Motion in Working Memory.

Spatiotemporal dynamics of working memory under the influence of emotions based on EEG

The Impact of Stimulus Format and Presentation Order on Social Working Memory Updating

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli.

Investigation of the interaction between emotion and working memory load using spatiotemporal pattern similarity analysis