Abstract:AbstractIntroductionWork related injuries in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are common because of the strains placed on the surgeon’s or assistant’s body. The objective of this study was to compare specific ergonomic risks among surgeons and surgical trainees performing robotic and laparoscopic procedures.Materials and methodsErgonomic data and discomfort questionnaires were recorded from surgeons and trainees (fellows/residents) for both robotic and laparoscopic procedures. Perceived discomfort questionnaires were recorded pre/postoperatively. Intraoperatively, biomechanical loads were captured using motion tracking sensors and electromyography (EMG) sensors. Perceived discomfort, body position and muscle activity were compared between robotic and laparoscopic procedures using a linear regression model.ResultsTwenty surgeons and surgical trainees performed 29 robotic and 48 laparoscopic procedures. Postoperatively, increases in right finger numbness and right shoulder stiffness and surgeon irritability were noted after laparoscopy and increased back stiffness after robotic surgery. Further, the laparoscopic group saw increases in right hand/shoulder pain (OR 0.8; p = 0.032) and left hand/shoulder pain (0.22; p < 0.001) compared to robotic. Right deltoid and trapezius excessive muscle activity were significantly higher in laparoscopic operations compared to robotic. Demanding and static positioning was similar between the two groups except there was significantly more static neck position required for robotic operations.ConclusionRobotic assisted surgeries led to lower postoperative discomfort and muscle strain in both upper extremities, particularly dominant side of the surgeon, but increased static neck positioning with subjective back stiffness compared with laparoscopy. These recognized ergonomic differences between the two platforms can be used to raise surgeon awareness of their intraoperative posture and to develop targeted physical and occupational therapy interventions to decrease surgeon WMSDs and increase surgeon longevity.

Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics

A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics

Ergonomic Considerations in Robotic-assisted Microsurgery

Ergonomic interventions to reduce upper limb musculoskeletal pain during robotic surgery: a narrative review

Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery

Assessing Muscular Pain and Ergonomics Among Robotic Surgeons in China: A Validation

Overview of robotic colorectal surgery: Current and future practical developments

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk

Enhancing robotic efficiency through the eyes of robotic surgeons: sub-analysis of the expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS) study

Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer: Principles and Pitfalls

Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future Directions

Future of Flexible Robotic Endoscopy Systems

Robotic assisted surgery reduces ergonomic risk during minimally invasive colorectal resection: the VOLCANO randomised controlled trial

Pediatric colorectal robotic surgery

A review of ergonomic positions to improve musculoskeletal distress in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeons according to open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries

Future perspectives in robotic surgery

Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version

Robotic surgery for multi-visceral resection in locally advanced colorectal cancer: Techniques, benefits and future directions

Emerging Robotic Platforms for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: Past, Present, and Future