EBUS-TBNA Cytological Samples for Comprehensive Molecular Testing in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Roberto Martin-Deleon,Cristina Teixido,Carmen Mª Lucena,Daniel Martinez,Ainhoa Fontana,Roxana Reyes,Mireia García,Nuria Viñolas,Ivan Vollmer,Marcelo Sanchez,Pedro Jares,Francisco Manuel Pérez,Naiara Vega,Elba Marin,Ramón Mª Marrades,Carlos Agustí,Noemi Reguart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092084
2021-04-25
Cancers
Abstract:Clinical guidelines promote the identification of several targetable biomarkers to drive treatment decisions in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but half of all patients do not have a viable biopsy. Specimens from endobronchial-ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are an alternative source of material for the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, however their usefulness for a complete molecular characterization remains controversial. EBUS-TBNA samples were prospectively tested for several biomarkers by next-generation sequencing (NGS), nCounter, and immunohistochemistry (PD-L1). The primary objectives were to assess the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA samples for a comprehensive molecular characterization and to compare its performance to the reference standard of biopsy samples. Seventy-two EBUS-TBNA procedures were performed, and 42 NSCLC patients were diagnosed. Among all cytological samples, 92.9% were successfully genotyped by NGS, 95.2% by nCounter, and 100% by immunohistochemistry. There were 29 paired biopsy samples; 79.3% samples had enough tumor material for genomic genotyping, and 96.6% for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. A good concordance was found between both sources of material: 88.9% for PD-L1, 100% for NGS and nCounter. EBUS-TBNA is a feasible alternative source of material for NSCLC genotyping and allows the identification of patient candidates for personalized therapies with high concordance when compared with biopsy.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?