Evidence for dopamine receptor stimulation by apomorphine
N. Andén,A. Rubenson,K. Fuxe,T. Hökfelt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1967.tb09604.x
1967-09-01
Abstract:Sm,-Recently, Ernst (1967) has reported that the apomorphine-induced compulsive gnawing in rats is not mediated via the release of catecholamines, since it is not reduced by the catecholamine synthesis inhibitors a-methyl-3,4dihydroxyphenylalanine and a-methyltyrosine. On the other hand, the gnawing seen after treatment with (+)-amphetamine is blocked by these synthesis inhibitors. Since the apomorphine-induced gnawing requires an intact corpus striatum and gnawing can also be produced by the catecholamine precursor dihydroxyphenylalanine, Ernst (1967) suggested that apomorphine acts on the dopamine receptors whereas amphetamine acts by releasing dopamine. In the present paper supporting evidence for this view is given by further functional, biochemical and histochemical studies. The functional influence of apomorphine on dopamine neurotransmission in the corpus striatum was examined after unilateral removal of the corpus striatum of adult hooded rats weighing about 200 g (And& Dahlstrom & others, 1966a). A possible action of apomorphine on the noradrenaline receptors of the spinal cord was tested in acutely spinalized adult hooded rats by evaluating the changes in the flexor reflex evoked by pinching the hind limbs. The effect of apomorphine on the dopamine and noradrenaline levels of the brain and spinal cord was determined biochemically (Bertler, Carlsson & Rosengren, 1958; Carlsson & Waldeck, 1958) and histochemically (Falck, Hillarp & others, 1962; Dahlstrom & Fuxe, 1964; Hamberger, Malmfors & Sachs, 1965). Function. These studies were made mainly on rats which had been pretreated with reserpine (10 mg/kg i.p., 3 hr) plus a-methyltyrosine methylester (H 44/68, 500mg/kg, i.p., 2 hr) after removal of the left corpus striatum by suction. After this treatment all the operated animals turned towards the unoperated side (cf. And6n & others, 1966a). After injection of apomorphine (1-25 mg/kg s.c.) these rats changed their position and turned or rotated towards the operated side. This effect began about 5 min after the injection and was evident for about 45-60 min. If apomorphine was given to operated rats not pretreated with reserpineH 44/68 combination, this action of apomorphine, like the gnawing, seemed to be less pronounced. If haloperidol (5 mg/kg i.p.) was given 15-20 min after apomorphine all the rats turned from the operated towards the unoperated side in about 15 min and the gnawing ceased. (+)-Amphetamine (0.5-25 mg/kg s.c.), like apomorphine, made the rats turn or rotate towards the operated side. In contrast to apomorphine, however, this action of amphetamine was not seen after pretreatment with reserpine plus H 44/68 (cf. Weissman, Koe & Tenen, 1966; Hanson, 1967; Ernst, 1967). Apomorphine (25 mg/kg s.c.), in contrast to (+)-amphetamine (05-25 mg/kg s.c.) and ~-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (50-75 mg/kg i.v. 2 hr after nialamide 50 mg/kg i.p.), did not cause a definite increase of the flexor reflex in spinalized rats. Chemistry. The biochemical results obtained in unoperated adult hooded rats are presented in Table 1. Apomorphine caused a retardation of the depletion in brain dopamine produced by H 44/68. The difference between the dopamine levels in the apomorphine-H 44/68 group and in the H 44/68 group is statistically significant (P < 0.001, Student’s r-test). This action of apomorphine on the brain dopamine was blocked by haloperidol. The disappearance of noradrenaline from the brain and the spinal cord after H 44/68 did not seem to be influenced by apomorphine. (+)-Amphetamine did not cause any significant retardation of the dopamine and noradrenaline loss after H 44/68.