Quality Assessment of an Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System in a Province of Nepal

Jyoti Acharya,Maria Zolfo,Wendemagegn Enbiale,Khine Wut Yee Kyaw,Meika Bhattachan,Nisha Rijal,Anjana Shrestha,Basudha Shrestha,Surendra Kumar Madhup,Bijendra Raj Raghubanshi,Hari Prasad Kattel,Piyush Rajbhandari,Parmananda Bhandari,Subhash Thakur,Saroj Sharma,Dipendra Raman Singh,Runa Jha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6020060
2021-04-23
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Abstract:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem, and Nepal is no exception. Countries are expected to report annually to the World Health Organization on their AMR surveillance progress through a Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, in which Nepal enrolled in 2017. We assessed the quality of AMR surveillance data during 2019–2020 at nine surveillance sites in Province 3 of Nepal for completeness, consistency, and timeliness and examined barriers for non-reporting sites. Here, we present the results of this cross-sectional descriptive study of secondary AMR data from five reporting sites and barriers identified through a structured questionnaire completed by representatives at the five reporting and four non-reporting sites. Among the 1584 records from the reporting sites assessed for consistency and completeness, 77–92% were consistent and 88–100% were complete, with inter-site variation. Data from two sites were received by the 15th day of the following month, whereas receipt was delayed by a mean of 175 days at three other sites. All four non-reporting sites lacked dedicated data personnel, and two lacked computers. The AMR surveillance data collection process needs improvement in completeness, consistency, and timeliness. Non-reporting sites need support to meet the specific requirements for data compilation and sharing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?