Abstract:The predicament of increasing environmental issues in the last few decades has increased the interest in clean energy sources. Some recently created sources of energy, for example, biomass energy, may decrease environmental pressure. This study aimed to uncover the causality between biomass energy consumption (BEC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in the United States (U.S.) using the bootstrap Granger full-sample and sub-sample rolling window estimates method for the period 1981M01 to 2019M12. A one-way relationship was indicated, from biomass energy consumption to CO2 emissions, using the Granger causality test. The durability of the estimated vector autoregressive (VAR) model has been calculated by considering the structural changes. The results show that BEC has both positive and negative effects on CO2 emissions in sub-samples, and CO2 emissions also show a causative relationship with biomass energy consumption. These outcomes can help policymakers consider biomass energy a perfect wellspring of energy to acquire environmental sustainability and energy security.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the causal relationship between biomass energy consumption (BEC) and carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), especially in the context of the United States. The research aims to analyze the data from January 1981 to December 2019 by using the bootstrap Granger full - sample and sub - sample rolling - window estimation methods to reveal the impact of biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide emissions and the reverse impact of carbon dioxide emissions on biomass energy consumption. ### Research Background In recent years, with the increasing seriousness of environmental problems, the demand for clean energy has gradually increased. As a new type of energy that may reduce environmental pressure, biomass energy has attracted wide attention. However, there are different views in the academic community regarding the role of biomass energy in environmental protection. On the one hand, some studies have shown that biomass energy can reduce carbon dioxide emissions; on the other hand, some studies have also pointed out that biomass energy may increase carbon dioxide emissions in some cases. Therefore, clarifying the relationship between biomass energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions is of great significance for formulating effective environmental protection policies. ### Research Methods 1. **Data Sources**: The research used monthly data from January 1981 to December 2019, and the data were from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2. **Methods**: - **Bootstrap Full - sample Granger Causality Test**: By constructing a bivariate vector autoregressive (VAR) model and using the bootstrap residuals method (R.B.) technique to improve the likelihood ratio (L.R.) statistic, test the causal relationship between BEC and CO2. - **Parameter Stability Test**: Use Sup - F, Mean - F, Exp - F tests and Lc test to check the stability of parameters to verify whether there are structural changes. - **Bootstrap Rolling - window Sub - sample Causality Test**: Divide the entire time series into multiple sub - samples and gradually check the causal relationship of each sub - sample to capture changes over time. ### Main Findings 1. **Full - sample Test Results**: In the full sample, there is a significant Granger causal relationship between BEC and CO2 emissions, while the impact of CO2 on BEC is not significant. 2. **Parameter Stability Test Results**: The Sup - F, Mean - F, Exp - F and Lc tests all show that the time - series parameters of BEC and CO2 and the parameters of the VAR model are unstable over time. 3. **Sub - sample Test Results**: Through the rolling - window sub - sample test, it was found that during the periods from November 1985 to January 1988, from October 1993 to October 1994, from January 1998 to June 1998, from August 2001 to December 2003, from January 2006 to December 2008, from January 2010 to January 2013, from January 2014 to February 2016 and from February 2018 to June 2019, BEC has a significant negative impact on CO2 emissions. At the same time, during the periods from October 1984 to January 1987, from July 1988 to February 1990, from September 1998 to May 1999, from July 2002 to December 2002, from April 2006 to April 2011 and from October 2012 to December 2014, CO2 also has a significant causal relationship with BEC. ### Discussion The research results show that the impact of BEC on CO2 emissions varies significantly in different time periods. For example, during the period from November 1985 to January 1988, due to the reduction in ethanol production, biomass energy consumption decreased, which increased CO2 emissions. In other time periods, such as from January 1998 to June 1998, due to the increase in ethanol subsidies, BEC increased, which helped to reduce CO2 emissions. These findings provide important references for policymakers, especially in promoting biomass energy as clean energy. ### Conclusion This study, through detailed empirical analysis, reveals the complex relationship between BEC and CO2 emissions and emphasizes the importance of considering time - varying and structural changes. These results help policymakers better understand the role of biomass energy in environmental protection and thus formulate more effective energy policies.

The imperativeness of biomass energy consumption to the environmental sustainability of the United States revisited

Role of financial regulations and climate policy uncertainty in reducing CO2 emissions—an application of bootstrap subsample rolling-window Granger causality

How to Bend Down the Environmental Kuznets Curve: the Significance of Biomass Energy

An investigation into the anthropogenic effect of biomass energy utilization and economic sustainability on environmental degradation in E7 economies

Assessing the effectiveness of biomass energy in mitigating CO2 emissions: Evidence from Top-10 biomass energy consumer countries

Asymmetric linkage between biomass energy consumption and ecological footprints in top ten biomass-consuming nations

Disaggregated Impact of Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on the Environmental Sustainability of the United States: A Novel Dynamic ARDL Approach

Environmental Impact of Biomass Energy Consumption on Sustainable Development: Evidence from ARDL Bound Testing Approach

Does economic policy uncertainty, energy transition and ecological innovation affect environmental degradation in the United States?

Novel Research Methods for Estimating the Impact of Energy Use on Ecological Environment: Evidence from B.R.I.C.S. Economies

Determinants of the Behavioral Lock-in of Rural Residents' Direct Biomass Energy Consumption in China

Growing green through biomass energy consumption: the role of natural resource and globalization in a world economy

Environmental sustainability and biomass energy consumption through the lens of pollution Haven hypothesis and renewable energy-environmental kuznets curve

The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America

Uncovering the drivers of CO2 emissions in the United States: The hidden spillover effects

Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints: analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries

Unlocking the role of biofuel energy consumption and democratic accountability on ecological sustainability in the United States: a quantile-based analysis

Linkages between environmental sustainability, disaggregated emission, renewable energy, and energy efficiency: An evidence from BRI countries

Does biomass energy consumption mitigate CO2 emissions? The role of economic growth and urbanization: evidence from developing Asia

Assessment of sustainability and uncertainties of oil markets: mediating determinants of energy use and CO2 emissions

Investigating the impacts of biomass energy consumption and natural resource rent on economic growth under various regimes in emerging economies