The application of expanded noninvasive prenatal screening for genome-wide chromosomal abnormalities and genetic counseling

Yun Chen,Yunli Lai,Fuben Xu,Haisong Qin,Yanqing Tang,Xiaoshan Huang,Lintao Meng,Jiasun Su,Weijia Sun,Yiping Shen,Hongwei Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1907333
2021-05-02
Abstract:<span>To evaluate the clinical application of expanded noninvasive prenatal screening (eNIPS) for genome-wide large copy number variation (CNV), i.e. chromosomal deletion/duplication &gt;5 Mb, and aneuploidy; also to provide practical information for counseling eNIPS positive cases.We recruited 34,620 women with singleton pregnancy for genome-wide cell-free plasma DNA sequencing. Screening positive cases were verified by karyotyping and/or SNP array.A total of 461 (1.33%) positive cases were identified through our cfDNA screening including 209 cases of common trisomies (0.60%), 124 cases of sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) (0.36%), 71 cases of other autosomal anueploidies (OAA) (0.21%), and 57 CNVs larger than 5 Mb (0.16%). The predictive positive values (PPV) were 70.06% in general for common trisomies with as high as 91.67% for Trisomy21 (T21), 40.22% in general for SCAs with as high as 100% for Jacob Syndrome (XYY). The PPV for OAAs was 5.45%, and T7/T8/T16/T22 were the most frequent OAAs (<i>n</i> = 15, 9, 9, 8, respectively). The PPV for CNVs larger than 5 Mb was 51.22% (<i>n</i> = 57) with the CNV mostly detected on Chr5/Chr4/Chr2/Chr7 (<i>n</i> = 10, 8, 5, 5, respectively).The expanded NIPS had shown promising PPVs for CNVs (large than 5 Mb), SCAs and common trisomies, yet this method required higher efficacy in screening for OAAs. The post-test genetic counseling for expanded NIPS should be tailored to the types of positive cases and also address the origin of abnormal signals (fetal vs. maternal).</span>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?