The Effect of Estetrol/Drospirenone on Ovarian Function Is Similar to a Well-Established Combined Oral Contraceptive: Results From a Phase 2 Study

Ingrid J M Duijkers,Christine Klipping,Maud Jost,Adriana Bastidas,Jean Michel F Foidart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1495

2021-05-01

Journal of the Endocrine Society

Abstract:Abstract Background: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) often contain ethinylestradiol (EE), an estrogen known to be associated with several side effects including venous thromboembolism. Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen synthesized by the human fetal liver during pregnancy. Results from a phase 2 dose-finding study showed that E4 15 mg in combination with drospirenone 3 mg (E4/DRSP) resulted in a good bleeding profile and cycle control. Here, we present phase 2 results showing the effect of E4/DRSP on ovarian function. Study Design: A single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel study was conducted in healthy young volunteers with proven ovulatory cycles. Study subjects received either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg (n=41) or EE 20 μg/DRSP 3 mg (n=41) in a 24/4-day regimen for three consecutive cycles. Both in cycle 1 and 3, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol and progesterone levels were determined, and follicular size and endometrial thickness were measured every three days using transvaginal ultrasound. Ovarian function was assessed using the Hoogland score, which considers follicular size and estradiol/progesterone levels. Return of ovulation was determined after treatment cessation. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical and gynecological examination, clinical laboratory parameters, 12-lead electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Results: No ovulations were reported during the use of E4/DRSP, while three ovulations occurred in two subjects in the EE/DRSP group. In both groups, most participants had no ovarian activity according to the Hoogland score. In cycle 1, Hoogland scores and follicular diameters were similar in both groups. In cycle 3, these parameters were slightly less suppressed in the E4/DRSP group when compared to EE/DRSP. While mean FSH and LH concentrations were less inhibited by E4/DRSP, mean estradiol and progesterone concentrations and endometrial thickness were similarly suppressed in both groups. Return of ovulation occurred on average 15.5 days after discontinuation of E4/DRSP intake. The number of frequently reported AEs considered to be related to study medication was similar for both treatment groups except for breast pain (11 subjects in the E4/DRSP group versus 4 subjects with EE/DRSP). Most related AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. Three subjects discontinued due to an AE, one with E4/DRSP (severe stress, emotional lability), and two with EE/DRSP (emotional lability, depressed mood). Other safety assessments did not show significant abnormalities. No serious AEs were reported. Conclusions: The combination of E4 15 mg and DRSP 3 mg results in adequate ovulation inhibition and ovarian function suppression, which is similar to a well-established COC containing EE/DRSP. E4/DRSP is considered safe and well-tolerated.