Abstract:Modelling the volatility has attracted a great deal of attention in the literature of financial economics and econometrics.As a measure of risk,volatility modelling is important to researchers,policy makers and regulators as it is closely related to the stability of financial markets,and the SV models are used to model the dynamics of volatility.It has been well-documented in the literature that the volatility exhibits two typical features,namely the asymmetric effects (include leverage and size effects) on volatility caused by previous returns and the long-range dependence in volatility.It is important to accommodate these features in volatility in the SV models.In recent years,high-frequency financial data is available and a number of realized measures of volatility have been introduced,including realized volatility and realized range volatility.These measures are far more informative about the current level of volatility than the daily returns.Standard SV models utilizes daily returns to extract information about the current level of volatility.A shortcoming of conventional SV models is the fact that returns are rather weak signals about the level of volatility.This makes SV models poorly suited for situations where volatility changes rapidly to a new level.Incorporating realized measures into SV models is expected to alleviate this problem.Based on the above analysis,in this paper the two-factor asymmetric realized SV (2FARSV) model is proposed,which incorporates the basic SV model (which uses daily returns) with asymmetric effects (leverage and size effects),long memory property of the volatility and high-frequency intraday information provided by the realized measure by taking account of the realized measure biases.A maximum likelihood estimation method based on the continuous particle filters is used to estimate the parameters of the 2FARSV model.The monte Carlo simulation study shows that the estimation method performs well.The 2FARSV model is appiled to the realized volatility (RV) and realized range volatility (RRV) computed from the high-frequency intraday data of Shanghai Stock Exchange composite index and Shenzhen Stock Exchange component index.The results show that the RV and RRV are (downward) biased estimators of the true daily volatility.This implies that the effect of non-trading hours is stronger than that of microstructure noise.The RRV is the more effective volatility estimator than the RV,but it leads to more downward bias.In addition,evidence of strong volatility persistence and volatility asymmetry (leverage and size effects) is detected in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets.According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC),the 2FARSV model fits the data better than the one-factor asymmetric realized SV (1FARSV) model,the two-factor realized SV (2FRSV) model,the two-factor leverage realized SV (2FLRSV) model and the realized GARCH model.Model diagnostics suggest that the 2FARSV model is sufficient to capture the dynamics of the volatility (time-varying volatility,volatility clustering,volatility asymmetry and long memory property of the volatility).This study enriches the empirical research on the volatility modelling based on the high-frequency data.It's also a worthwhile endeavor to further investigate the performance of the 2FARSV model in asset pricing and value-at-risk calculation.

The Low-volatility Anomaly and the Adaptive Multi-Factor Model

High-Dimensional Estimation, Basis Assets, and the Adaptive Multi-Factor Model

Time-Invariance Coefficients Tests with the Adaptive Multi-Factor Model

The Nature of Alpha

Anomaly or Risk Factor? A Stepwise Evaluation

Factor Investing for the Long Run

Factor Models for Portfolio Selection in Large Dimensions: The Good, the Better and the Ugly

A two-Factor Asset Pricing Model and the Fat Tail Distribution of Firm Sizes

An Analysis of the Fama-French Three-Factor Models Capacity to Account for Cross-sectional Volatility in Stock Returns

A Factor Portfolio Asset Pricing Model Based on the Optimal Distribution of Risk and Return

Generalized dynamic factor models and volatilities: recovering the market volatility shocks

A Model of Anomaly Discovery

Testing Alphas in Conditional Time-Varying Factor Models with High-Dimensional Assets

Conditional Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies

Adaptive Robust Large Volatility Matrix Estimation Based on High-Frequency Financial Data

Adaptive Testing for Alphas in Conditional Factor Models with High Dimensional Assets

Two-factor Asymmetric Realized SV Model and Its Empirical Test

The Long-run Risks Model: What Differences Can an Extra Volatility Factor Make?

Multivariate tempered stable model with long-range dependence and time-varying volatility

Attention and Underreaction-Related Anomalies

Data-generating process and time-series asset pricing