Assessing the Toxicity of Mine‐Water Mixtures and the Effectiveness of Water Quality Guideline Values in Protecting Local Aquatic Species

Melanie A. Trenfield,Ceiwen J. Pease,Samantha L. Walker,Scott J. Markich,Chris L. Humphrey,Rick A. Dam,Andrew J. Harford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5103
2021-06-22
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Abstract:<p>Six tropical freshwater species were used to assess the toxicity of mine waters from a uranium mine adjacent to a World‐Heritage area in northern Australia. Key contaminants of potential concern for the mine are uranium (U), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and total ammonia nitrogen (TAN). Direct toxicity assessments were carried out to assess whether the established site‐specific guideline values for individual contaminants would be protective with the contaminants occurring as mixtures. Metal speciation was calculated for contaminants to determine which were major contributors of toxicity, with 84‐96% of Mg predicted in the free ion form as Mg<sup>2+</sup>, and 76‐92% of Mn predicted as Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Uranium, aluminium and copper (Cu) were predicted to be strongly bound to fulvic acid. Uranium, Mg, Mn and Cu were incorporated into concentration addition (CA) or independent action (IA) mixture toxicity models to compare the observed toxicity in each of the waters with predicted toxicity. For &gt;90% of data, mine water toxicity was less than predicted by the CA model. Instances where toxicity was greater than predicted were accompanied by exceedances of individual metal guideline values in all but one case, i.e., a Mg concentration within 10% of the guideline value. This indicates existing individual Water Quality Guideline Values for U, Mg, Mn and TAN would adequately protect ecosystems downstream of the mine.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
environmental sciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?