Abstract:Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

An emergent mechanism of selective visual attention in Drosophila

Mushroom bodies modulate salience-based selective fixation behavior in Drosophila.

Research Progress on Drosophila Visual Cognition in China

Insect Behavior: Visual Cognition in Fruit Fly

Long-term but Not Short-Term Blockade of Dopamine Release in Drosophila Impairs Orientation During Flight in a Visual Attention Paradigm.

Dopamine-Mushroom Body Circuit Regulates Saliency-Based Decision-Making in Drosophila

Intrinsic Activity in the Fly Brain Gates Visual Information During Behavioral Choices

Social state gates vision using three circuit mechanisms in Drosophila

Oscillations in the central brain of Drosophila are phase locked to attended visual features

Visual Attention in Flies—Dopamine in the Mushroom Bodies Mediates the After-Effect of Cueing

Ke Zhang Drosophila Decision-Making in Dopamine-Mushroom Body Circuit Regulates Saliency-Based

The Emergence of Directional Selectivity in the Visual Motion Pathway of Drosophila

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

A Hierarchical Model of Visual Processing Simulates Neural Mechanisms Underlying Reflexive Attention.

A Disinhibitory Mechanism Biases Drosophila Innate Light Preference

Modeling Drosophila vision neural pathways to detect weak moving targets from cluttered backgrounds

Neural coding in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster: How do small neural populations support visually guided behaviours?

Quantitative Predictions Orchestrate Visual Signaling in Drosophila

Behavioral state modulates the ON visual motion pathway of Drosophila

Choice Behavior of Drosophila Facing Contradictory Visual Cues.

Drosophila-Vision-Inspired Motion Perception Model and Its Application in Saliency Detection