A Patient with Apparently Reciprocal Translocation and Cryptic 10p Deletion
Lingqian Wu,Lei Xi,Hua Wang,Zhongmin Zhou,Weigang Lv,Desheng Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33734
2011-01-01
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Abstract:We describe a patient with mild mental retardation and facial anomalies, with an apparently balanced reciprocal translocation t(8;18)(p21; p11). Further analysis showed a cryptic 10p deletion. She was referred to us, at age 25, regarding the possibility of having a healthy offspring. At age 23, her first pregnancy had been terminated because a single umbilical artery and wide lateral ventricles shown by B-scan ultrasonography. A karyotype showed 46, XY, der(18)t(8;18) (p21;p11) using G-banded analysis of the umbilical cord blood lymphocytes at the 27th gestational week. One year later, she had a spontaneous abortion at 12 weeks gestation. The patient’s history showed that she was born at full-term with a birth weight of 3,100 g following an uneventful pregnancy as the only child of healthy, nonconsanguineous parents. She raised her head at 3 months, sat independently and began to crawl at 7 months, and walked alone and spoke a few words at 16 months. At 6 years, she presented with restlessness and mild language impairment. She finished primary school with her peers; then secondary and occupational high school with poor achievement. She married a healthy man when she was 22 years old. At age 25 years, her weight was 55 kg, height 167 cm, OFC 56.5 cm, which are all within normal limits. Facial features observed include a flat face with a broad nasal bridge, almond-shaped eyes, effacement of superior crus of antihelix, high palatal arch, and mandibular prognathism; and bristle hair and low hairline at the back of the neck were noted (Fig. 1A,B). She had mild intellectual disability with an IQ of 60 and some unusual behavior, including indolence, speaking infrequently, wandering outside, and being deceitful. Examination protocols were approved by the university ethics committees. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and her parents. For both the patient and her parents, G-banded karyotyping at band levels 550 was performed on metaphase spreads from peripheral blood lymphocytes according to the standard cytogenetic procedures. The results showed that the patient carried a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 8 and 18 that was designated as 46, XX, t(8;18) (p21.3;p11.3) (Fig. 1C). The karyotypes of her parents are normal. With a standard procedure supplied by the manufacturer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed to the patient using the BAC clones mapped to 8p21.3 and 18p11.32, revealing that 8p breakpoint is within RP11-274M9 (nt. 22,610,552–22,772,522) and 18p breakpoint between RP1129M13 and RP11-143N6 (nt. 1,450,142–2,162,954) (data not shown). There is no UCSC RefSeq gene within the 18p breakpoint region and the 8p breakpoint interrupts the PEBP4 gene that seems to promote cellular resistance to TNF-induced apoptosis and is unlikely to be responsible for the patient’s phenotype. Considering that cryptic chromosomal abnormalities are associated with abnormal phenotypes, genome-wide copy number analysis was performed on this patient. The Infinium HumanHap550k SNP genotyping BeadChips with the protocol supplied by Illumina (http://www.Illumina.com) was utilized. The result revealed a heterozygous deletion at 10p12.1->p12.31 (10:21,597, 792–26,379,342) (Fig. 1E) and confirmed that there were no deletions or duplications at the breakpoints of 8p and 18p. To confirm the result of SNP array, FISH was performed to both patient and parents using RP11-615P7 (red), RP11-469D16 (green), and RP11-48A2 (orange, as a control) that mapped to 10p12.1, 10p12.31, and 10q26.2, respectively. The results showed a heterozygous deletion at 10p12.1p12.31 that was consistent with