High-Dose Methotrexate as CNS Prophylaxis in High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma
Katharine L. Lewis,Lasse H. Jakobsen,Diego Villa,Karin E. Smedby,Kerry J. Savage,Toby A. Eyre,Kate Cwynarski,Mark J. Bishton,Christopher P. Fox,Eliza A. Hawkes,Matthew J. Maurer,Tarec C. El-Galaly,Chan Y. Cheah,Sabela Bobillo,Paris L. Caporn,Joan Van Zyl,Magdalena Klanova,Marek Trněny,Robert Puckrin,Douglas A. Stewart,Aung M. Tun,Gita Thanarajasingam,Ranjit Nair,Loretta Nastoupil,Faouzi Djebbari,Erel Joffe,Sandra Eloranta,Sara Harrysson,Laurie H. Sehn,Seth M. Maliske,Kittika Poonsombudlert,Xiao Y. Guo,Greg Hapgood,Kate Manos,Jahanzaib Khwaja,Adrian Minson,Michael Dickinson,Andreas K. Øvlisen,Gareth P. Gregory,Michael Gilbertson,Isaac T. Streit,Hamish W. Scott,Matthew Ku,Sanjay de Mel,Kar Ying Yong,Liu Xin,Mridula Mokoonlall,Dipti Talaulikar,Nada Hamad,Sathia S. Srinivasan,Nicholas L. McVilly,Anna M. Johnston,Matthew J. Brunner,Priyanka A. Pophali,on behalf of the International CNS Prophylaxis Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.00365
IF: 45.3
2023-10-07
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:PURPOSE CNS progression or relapse is an uncommon but devastating complication of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. There is no consensus regarding the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis. This study was designed to determine whether high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is effective at preventing CNS progression in patients at high risk of this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 18-80 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS progression, treated with curative-intent anti–CD20-based chemoimmunotherapy, were included in this international, retrospective, observational study. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and cumulative risks of CNS progression were calculated according to use of HD-MTX, with time to CNS progression calculated from diagnosis for all patients (all-pts) and from completion of frontline systemic lymphoma induction therapy, for patients in complete response at completion of chemoimmunotherapy (CR-pts). RESULTS Two thousand four hundred eighteen all-pts (HD-MTX; n = 425) and 1,616 CR-pts (HD-MTX; n = 356) were included. CNS International Prognostic Index was 4-6 in 83.4% all-pts. Patients treated with HD-MTX had a lower risk of CNS progression (adjusted HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.90]; P = .014), but significance was not retained when confined to CR-pts (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.30]; P = .29), with 5-year adjusted risk difference of 1.6% (95% CI, –1.5 to 4.4; all-pts) and 1.4% (95% CI, –1.5 to 4.1; CR-pts). Subgroups were underpowered to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of HD-MTX in individual high-risk clinical scenarios; however, there was no clear reduction in CNS progression risk with HD-MTX in any high-risk subgroup. CONCLUSION In this large study, high-risk patients receiving HD-MTX had a 7.2% 2-year risk of CNS progression, consistent with the progression risk in previously reported high-risk cohorts. Use of HD-MTX was not associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of CNS progression.
oncology