Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

Maxmin Expected Utility over Savage Acts with a Set of Priors

Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior

Maximum Score Estimation of Preference Parameters for a Binary Choice Model under Uncertainty

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

Non-Classical Expected Utility Theory

Robust Decision Making Using a General Utility Set

Nonconcave Robust Utility Maximization under Projective Determinacy

A Rank-Dependent Theory for Decision under Risk and Ambiguity

Combining Savage and Laplace: a new approach to ambiguity

Axiomatic Foundations for a Class of Generalized Expected Utility: Algebraic Expected Utility

Mixture independence foundations for expected utility

Expected utility theory with probability grids and preference formation

Generalised Entropy MDPs and Minimax Regret

Subjective Expected Utility and Psychological Gambles

RPS(1) Preferences

Expected multi-utility representations of preferences over lotteries

Multistage Utility Preference Robust Optimization

Optimal Insurance under Maxmin Expected Utility

Utility maximization in constrained and unbounded financial markets: Applications to indifference valuation, regime switching, consumption and Epstein-Zin recursive utility

If MaxEnt RL is the Answer, What is the Question?

Dynamically Consistent α-Maxmin Expected Utility