Abstract:BACKGROUND: In arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) play key roles in regulating seasonal flowering-responses to synchronize flowering with optimal conditions. FT is a promoter of flowering activated by long days and by warm conditions. FLC represses FT to delay flowering until plants experience winter.SCOPE: The identification of genes controlling flowering in cereals allows comparison of the molecular pathways controlling seasonal flowering-responses in cereals with those of arabidopsis. The role of FT has been conserved between arabidopsis and cereals; FT-like genes trigger flowering in response to short days in rice or long days in temperate cereals, such as wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare). Many varieties of wheat and barley require vernalization to flower but FLC-like genes have not been identified in cereals. Instead, VERNALIZATION2 (VRN2) inhibits long-day induction of FT-like1 (FT1) prior to winter. VERNALIZATION1 (VRN1) is activated by low-temperatures during winter to repress VRN2 and to allow the long-day response to occur in spring. In rice (Oryza sativa) a VRN2-like gene Ghd7, which influences grain number, plant height and heading date, represses the FT-like gene Heading date 3a (Hd3a) in long days, suggesting a broader role for VRN2-like genes in regulating day-length responses in cereals. Other genes, including Early heading date (Ehd1), Oryza sativa MADS51 (OsMADS51) and INDETERMINATE1 (OsID1) up-regulate Hd3a in short days. These genes might account for the different day-length response of rice compared with the temperate cereals. No genes homologous to VRN2, Ehd1, Ehd2 or OsMADS51 occur in arabidopsis.CONCLUSIONS: It seems that different genes regulate FT orthologues to elicit seasonal flowering-responses in arabidopsis and the cereals. This highlights the need for more detailed study into the molecular basis of seasonal flowering-responses in cereal crops or in closely related model plants such as Brachypodium distachyon.

Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis

Molecular basis of flowering under natural long-day conditions in Arabidopsis

CONSTANS alters the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana

Molecular Basis of Natural Variation in Photoperiodic Flowering Responses

CONSTANS, a HUB for all seasons: How photoperiod pervades plant physiology regulatory circuits

The molecular biology of seasonal flowering-responses in Arabidopsis and the cereals

Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response.

Photoperiodic Regulation of Flowering Time Through Periodic Histone Deacetylation of the Florigen Gene FT

Coordinated Transcriptional Regulation Underlying the Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis photoperiodic regulator CONSTANS feeds back to control the circadian clock

Correct biological timing in Arabidopsis requires multiple light-signaling pathways

Molecular Genetic Understanding of Photoperiodic Regulation of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis and Soybean

Enabling Photoperiodic Control of Flowering by Timely Chromatin Silencing of the Florigen Gene

The transcriptional repressor complex FRS7-FRS12 regulates flowering time and growth in Arabidopsis

A Complex Genetic Interaction Between Arabidopsis Thaliana TOC1 and CCA1/LHY in Driving the Circadian Clock and in Output Regulation

Linked circadian outputs control elongation growth and flowering in response to photoperiod and temperature

Transcription Factors FHY3 and FAR1 Regulate Light-Induced CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 Gene Expression in Arabidopsis

Genetic and Epigenetic Understanding of the Seasonal Timing of Flowering

Research Progress of Molecular Mechanism of the Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis

Feedback Regulation of COOLAIR Expression Controls Seed Dormancy and Flowering Time

An Evolutionarily Conserved DOF-CONSTANS Module Controls Plant Photoperiodic Signaling