Cognitive resource theory and the utilization of the leader's and group members' technical competence

Susan E. Murphy,Dewey Blyth,Fred E. Fiedler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(92)90014-7
IF: 9.924
1992-09-01
The Leadership Quarterly
Abstract:The belief that technical competence leads to improved job performance is often left unquestioned. For various reasons, however, research has failed to demonstrate a consistent relationship. Two related experiments investigated the conditions under which technical training for leaders and group members contributes to group performance. The first study compared the effectiveness of decisions in groups in which the leader was (a) instructed to be either directive or nondirective and (b) given or not given a brief training period to provide task-relevant knowledge for making the required group decisions. A second study compared the performance of trained group members under directive and nondirective leaders. As hypothesized, the leader's technical knowledge or expertise contributed to group performance only if the leader was both trained and directive; group members' task-relevant knowledge contributed to group performance only if the leader was nondirective. The results are discussed in the context of Cognitive Resource Theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?