Continuous positive airway pressure adherence and blood pressure lowering in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and nocturnal hypertension

Jia-Hui Xia,Yuan-Yuan Kang,Yi-Bang Cheng,Qi-Fang Huang,Ting-Yan Xu,Yan Li,Ji-Guang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2021.1922267
2021-05-11
Blood Pressure
Abstract:<span>We investigated continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence and its association with the blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate changes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and hypertension.In a single-blind trial, patients were randomly assigned to CPAP or sham CPAP treatment for 3 months. We performed clinic, ambulatory and home BP measurements at baseline and during follow-up. CPAP adherence was assessed as the CPAP frequency per week and time per night. Non-adherence was defined as a CPAP use for &lt;5 days/week or &lt;4 h/night.In the CPAP (<i>n</i> = 26) and sham CPAP groups (<i>n</i> = 21), the CPAP frequency was 5.5 and 4.8 days/week (<i>p</i> = 0.17), respectively, and the CPAP time was 5.0 and 4.1 h/night (<i>p</i> = 0.03), respectively. The corresponding prevalence of non-adherence was 46.2% and 66.7% (<i>p</i> = 0.16), respectively. The CPAP frequency but not time tended to be associated with the changes in BP and pulse rate at 3 months of follow-up, especially home systolic/diastolic BP in the CPAP group (3.2/1.3 mmHg greater reductions per 1 day increment, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). Adherent, compared with non-adherent patients, had greater reductions in BP or pulse rate at 3 months of follow-up. In the CPAP and sham CPAP groups combined, statistical significance was achieved for the adjusted between adherence and non-adherence differences in home systolic/diastolic BP (–5.0/–3.8 mmHg) and 24-h, daytime and night-time ambulatory pulse rate (–6.2, −7.8 and −4.4 beats/min, respectively, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.04).CPAP adherence was associated with the BP lowering and pulse rate slowing effects, especially the CPAP frequency.</span>
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?