Fried Frailty Phenotype in Elderly Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Impact on Hospitalization
Huan Nguyen,Huong Do,Hai Nguyen,Tan Nguyen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s452462
2024-03-20
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Huan Thanh Nguyen, 1, 2 Huong Thanh Do, 2 Hai Van Be Nguyen, 2 Tan Van Nguyen 1, 3 1 Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 2 Department of Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 3 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Correspondence: Huan Thanh Nguyen, Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 17 Hong Bang Street, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Tel +84-909097849, Email Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and factors associated with frailty and impact of frailty on hospitalization due to any cause in elderly patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Patients and Methods: We conducted a study wherein we assessed frailty using Fried frailty phenotype for outpatients aged ≥ 60 years with CCS. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with frailty. Frailty was adjusted for demographic and geriatric variables and comorbidities to assess its impact on hospitalization. Results: Overall, 420 patients (median age 70 years [interquartile range, 65– 77]; men, 74.5%) who completed the 3-month follow-up period were analyzed. Coronary revascularization for > 1 year was the most common clinical scenario for CCS (59.8%; n = 251). The prevalence of non-frail, pre-frail, and frail patients were 22.4% (n = 94), 49.7% (n = 209), and 27.9% (n = 117), respectively. In the adjusted model, three factors associated with frailty were age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39– 3.75, P = 0.001), limitations in instrumental activity of daily living (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.33– 6.48, P < 0.001), and heart failure (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.32– 4.02, P = 0.003). The overall 3-month hospitalization rate was higher in frail patients than in non-frail patients (23.9% vs 13.5%, P = 0.012). Frailty was associated with hospitalization (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04– 3.30, P = 0.037) but in a weak strength of association (r = 0.126). Conclusion: The prevalence of frailty was 27.9% in the elderly patients with CCS. Age ≥ 75 years, limitations in functional status, and heart failure were associated with increased odds of frailty. Frailty was a predictor of 3-month all-cause hospitalization in these patients. Keywords: frailty, chronic coronary syndrome, elderly Coronary artery disease (CAD) has increased prevalence and incidence with age. 1 Although it remains one of the most medical life-threatening condition for the elderly, especially in acute atherothrombotic events called acute coronary syndromes (ACS), 2 most patients have stable periods presenting various clinical scenarios called chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). 3 Fortunately, CAD can in fact be prevented and controlled by lifestyle changes, pharmacologic therapy, and revascularization procedures to stabilize and regress the process of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. 3 However, the challenge is that the elderly with CAD may concurrently have geriatric issues, such as polypharmacy, multimorbidity, declines in physical and mental health, and frailty, which may influence prognosis and management of CAD. 4 Frailty is considered a clinical condition of increased and disproportionate vulnerability resulting from a decreased ability to recover homeostasis following stressor events due to age-related multisystem failure and pathological decline in reserves. 5 About one quarter of the elderly worldwide are frail, 6 and they have a higher risk of disability, hospitalization, and death. In the adverse events, the elderly who hospitalized due to frailty place a considerable pressure on health care systems, their relative caregivers, and themselves. 7 Among several frailty screening and assessment tools, 8 the Fried frailty phenotype can categorize elderly into non-frail, pre-frail, or frail, and has association with cardiovascular outcomes. 9,10 Given that both CAD and frailty are linked to the aging process and share some common pathophysiological pathways, frailty may thoroughly influence CAD expression, whereas CAD may accelerate the development of frailty. 11 However, although many studies have evaluated the impact of frailty on adverse health outcomes in elderly patients with ACS, 12 little clinical information is available to understand the burden and prognostic value of frailty in elderly patients with CCS. 13 Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to investigate the -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services