Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

Spin-offs and the listing phenomena

The Long-Term Performance of Parent Firms and Their Spin-Offs

Value creation through spin-offs: A review of the empirical evidence

Long-run performance of corporate spin-offs and sell-offs: Evidence from the JSE limited

Corporate spin-offs and stock performance: a comparative study of pure and composite schemes

Research on the Motivation and Effect of Corporate Spin-Offs and Listings Based on Hai Di Lao's Spin-off of Super Hi

Large Stockholder and Senior Manager Transferring of Listing Companies—An Empirical Study of the Market Performance

Reexamining information asymmetry related to corporate spin-offs

Motivation and Performance Analysis of Spin-offs and Listings: A Case Study of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port

The information spillover role of corporate spin‐offs in financing activities: Evidence from equity sales by private firms through Regulation D

Why Do Companies List Shares Abroad?: A Survey of the Evidence and Its Managerial Implications

Jiangsu Guotai Spin-off Listing Motivation and Effect Analysis

The ongoing contributions of spin-off research and practice to understanding corporate restructuring and wealth creation: $100 billion in 1 decade

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

Target Leverage and Leverage Deviation in Corporate Spin-Offs

Are Stock Price More Informative after Dual-Listing in Emerging Markets? Evidence from Hong Kong-Listed Chinese Companies

Underpricing and Operating Performance of Chinese B-Share Initial Public Offerings

Common Stock Delisting: An Empirical Analysis of Firms Performance

Growing through Spinoffs. Corporate Governance, Entry, and Innovation

The decision to list abroad: The case of ADRs and foreign IPOs by Chinese companies