Abstract:Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the need for modifications in grief therapy to move away from viewing grief as a treatable illness. It critiques the current pathologization of grief in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and explores how this approach can hinder the natural processes of grieving. The study questions the medicalization of grief and advocates for a more humanistic framework in grief therapy, emphasizing individualized and culturally sensitive approaches to mourning. Methodology: The study utilizes a structured literature review, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis to develop a humanistic grief therapy framework. By engaging with participants who have experienced loss and professionals in grief therapy, the research identifies key aspects of grief that extend beyond traditional diagnostic criteria. Through this qualitative approach, the study seeks to challenge the current diagnostic model and provide empathic methods for clients to express and share their unique grief narratives. Findings: The findings of this study highlight the limitations of the current diagnostic approach to grief therapy and emphasize the importance of moving towards a more compassionate and individualized understanding of grief. Through thematic analysis, the research uncovers significant aspects of grief that go beyond the criteria outlined in the DSM, emphasizing the need for a more holistic and culturally informed approach to supporting individuals in their grieving process. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Based on the study's findings, it is recommended that clinicians adopt a person-centered and culturally sensitive approach to grief therapy. The study advocates for a shift away from standardized treatment protocols towards more individualized and empathic interventions that honor the diverse ways in which individuals experience and express grief. By prioritizing empathy, understanding, and flexibility in therapeutic practice, clinicians can better support individuals through their unique mourning journeys and promote healing in a more humane and inclusive manner.

EXPLORING PERSONAL DEATH ANXIETY: INCREASING COUNSELOR COMPETENCE FOR GRIEF AND LOSS

Dearth of Death Competence in Counselor Education Programs

Death Anxiety: An Exploration of Professional Counselor Experiences

Supporting Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide or Other Traumatic Death: The Views of Counselors

Assessing Knowledge and Predicting Grief Counseling Skills Among University Counseling Center Therapists

When No One’s The Expert: A Preliminary Study of Social Workers’ Perspectives on Shared Loss in Counseling During COVID-19

A Qualitative Study on the Death Anxiety Experience in Youth

Death Anxiety, Religiosity and Culture: Implications for Therapeutic Process and Future Research

Existential, theological, and psychological concepts of death: a personal retrospective

Grief is a Human Experience, Not a Diagnosis That Needs Fixing: Clinicians Must Modify Their Thinking and Ways of Grief Therapy

School Counsellors' Perspectives on the Loss of a Colleague: A Qualitative Study

Psychological features of working with destructive conditions of elderly people

Death Anxiety and the Relational

Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety

Death's Chair: Sitting with Loss

Bereavement guilt among young adults impacted by caregivers' cancer: Associations with attachment style, experiential avoidance, and psychological flexibility

Personal Testimony About Dealing with Loss and Self-Care

The Psychology of Death: External Defense or Internal Growth?

Healthy Ways of Coping With Losses Related to the Aging Process

Grief Counseling Skill for a Surgeon

Grief and Sexual Intimacy: Exploring Therapists' Views of Bereaved Clients