Abstract:Context. The new giant segmented mirror telescopes will use laser guide stars (LGS) for their adaptive optics (AO) systems. Two options to use as wavefront sensors (WFS) are the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS) and the pyramid wavefront sensor (PWFS). Aims. In this paper, we compare the noise performance of the PWFS and the SHWFS. We aim to find which of the two WFS is the best to use in a single or tomographic configuration. Methods. To compute the noise performance we extended a noise model developed for the PWFS to be used with the SHWFS. To do this, we expressed the centroiding algorithm of the SHWFS as a matrix-vector multiplication, which allowed us to use the statistics of noise to compute its propagation through the AO loop. We validated the noise model with end-to-end simulations for telescopes of 8 and 16 m in diameter. Results. For an AO system with only one WFS, we found that, given the same number of subapertures, the PWFS outperforms the SHWFS. For a 40 m telescope, the limiting magnitude of the PWFS is around 1 magnitude higher than the SHWFS. When using multiple WFS and a Generalized least squares estimator to combine the signal, our model predicts that in a tomographic system, the SHWFS performs better than the PWFS having a limiting magnitude 0.3 magnitudes higher. If using sub-electron RON detectors for the PWFS, then the performances are almost identical between the two WFSs Conclusions. We conclude that when using a single WFS with LGS, the PWFS is a better alternative than the SH. However, for a tomographic system, either would have almost the same performance.

Comparative analysis of methods for calibration of aShack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

A New Type Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor Using Liquid Crystal Display

A new shack-hartmann type wavefront sensor using liquid crystal panels

Aberration Calibration in High-Na Spherical Surfaces Measurement on Point Diffraction Interferometry

Learning-based Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor for High-Order Aberration Detection.

Analysis On Relation Between Hartmann - Shack Wavefront Detection Error And Image Restoration Quality

Calibration for the Errors Resulted from Aberration in Long Focal Length Measurement

The wavefront aberration analysis and testing accuracy evaluation for the large aberration aspheric system based on the best fit sphere - art. no. 68342V

The Wavefront Aberration Analysis and Testing Accuracy Evaluation for the Large Aberration Aspheric System Based on the Best Fit Sphere

Arbitrary wavefront uncertainty evaluation for the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor using physical optics propagation

RGB Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor

Hartmann vs. reverse Hartmann test: a Fourier optics point of view

An Adaptive Algorithm for Wavefront Reconstruction Based on a Shack-Hartmann Sensor

Accuracy Analysis for Shack–Hartmann Wave Front Sensing with Extended Sources

Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor with array of phase coded masks

Analysis of the wavefront reconstruction error of the spot location algorithms for the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

Practical and Accurate Method for Aspheric Misalignment Aberrations Calibration in Non-Null Interferometric Testing

Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Detector Performance Numerical Simulation Analysis

Performance comparison of the Shack-Hartmann and pyramid wavefront sensors with a laser guide star for 40 m telescopes

Characterization of thick and contact lenses using an adaptive Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor: Limitations and solutions

Experimental Trials With The Optical Differentiation Wavefront Sensor For Extended Objects