Abstract:The Nordic countries constitute an interesting laboratory for the study of differentiated European Integration. Even though Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden share some historical, cultural, socio-economic and political characteristics, all those countries have ultimately opted for a different kind of relationship with the EU. Whereas Finland, a member of the Eurozone since its inception in 1999, has been considered to be part of the Union’s ‘inner core’ for quite some time, Iceland and Norway, in contrast, have opted to remain outside the EU albeit closely associated via the European Economic Area Agreement. The variation of relationships has also been reflected in Nordic parties’ positioning vis-à-vis European integration in general and differentiation of European integration in particular. Broadly speaking, party families can be distinguished along traditional (e.g., agrarian, Christian democratic, conservative, and social democratic) and modern (e.g., socialist left, green, and populist radical right) ideological orientations. Although political parties belonging to both the traditional and modern Nordic party families have adopted different stances on European differentiated integration, we would assume—against the backdrop of Nordic cooperation—higher levels of transnational cooperation in European matters. Consequently, this article examines the similarities and differences between parties belonging to the same ideological family, and the extent of transnational party cooperation in the Nordic countries. Drawing on a series of interviews conducted with party representatives as well as on official party documents, this article shows that although institutionalized party cooperation mostly reflects divisions between party families, such institutionalization does not include a common vision for European integration. We conclude that the low level of partisan Nordic integration is primarily caused by domestic-level factors, such as intra-party divisions, government participation and public opinion.

Multiple Institutional Embeddedness in Europe: The Case of Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish Government Officials

Comparing the domestic and the EU lobbying context: perceived agenda-setting influence in the multi-level system of the European Union

When Multilateralism Hits Brussels: Generalizations and an Agenda for Further Research

Policy Diffusion, Environmental Federalism, and Economic Efficiency – How Institutions Influence the Implementation of EU Legislation in Two Nordic Countries

Beyond Intergovernmental Cooperation: The Influence of the European Parliament and the Commission on EU Foreign and Security Policies

Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?

Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK

Limits to polycentricity? Institutional layering and policy feedbacks of building energy performance requirements in Sweden

Introduction: Emerging Coordination Practices in European Public Management

Learning in International Governmental Organizations

Agenda‐setting under pressure: Does domestic politics influence the European Commission?

Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community

The European art of governing. The tension between collegiality and national interests in the Cabinets of the European Commissioners

The External Dimension of European Union Marine Governance: Institutional Interplay between the EU and the International Maritime Organization

Historical Institutionalism in the Study of European Integration

Ministerial Autonomy, Parliamentary Scrutiny and Government Reform Output in Parliamentary Democracies

Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments

Historical institutionalism and institutional design: divergent pathways to regime complexes in Asia and Europe

Urbanization and the organization of territorial cohesion – results from a comparative Danish case-study on territorial inequality and social cohesion

The Strategic Management of Government Affairs in Brussels

A 'civic turn' in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden