Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

A Global Look at Psychological Barriers to Women's Progress in Management

“Why Can’t I Become a Manager?”—A Systematic Review of Gender Stereotypes and Organizational Discrimination

Women at Work: Pathways from Gender Stereotypes to Gender Bias and Discrimination

An Underexamined Inequality

Boundary Management Preferences from a Gender and Cross-Cultural Perspective

Gendered perceptions of career advancement barriers: Unveiling challenges to female corporate leadership development

Reducing Gender Bias in the Evaluation and Selection of Future Leaders: the Role of Decision-Makers' Mindsets about the Universality of Leadership Potential.

The Impact of the Need for Cognitive Closure on Attitudes toward Women as Managers and the Sequential Mediating Role of Belief in a Just World and Gender Essentialism

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women

The Gender Difference in Leadership Effectiveness and Its Sino-US Comparison

Gender bias in team-building activities: study from China shows gender influences peer assessments during werewolf role-playing game

Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future: Evidence of Dynamic Gender Stereotypes in Ghana

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Gender Stereotypes and Their Impact on Women’s Career Progressions from a Managerial Perspective

Metaphors Describing the Gendered Organization in the Career Advancement of Women: An Integrative Review

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment

Gender Diversity Programs, Perceived Potential for Advancement, and Organizational Attractiveness

Gender And Managerial Coaching Across Cultures: Female Managers Are Coaching More

The glass ceiling in context: the influence of CEO gender, recruitment practices and firm internationalisation on the representation of women in management

Breaking the glass ceiling: For one and all?

Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.