Validation of scanning laser Doppler flowmetry for retinal blood flow measurements in animal models

Yasuhiro Tamaki,Makoto Araie,Yasuhiro Fukaya,Kiyoshi Ishi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.24.5.332.8515

2002-01-01

Current Eye Research

Abstract:PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in retinal blood flow measurement in vivo using rabbit and monkey eyes and the microsphere technique.METHODS: A commercially available scanning laser Doppler flowmeter (SLDF), pigmented rabbits and cynomolgus monkeys were used. In rabbits, SLDF measurements at a retinal field approximately one papillary diameter away from the optic nerve head where discrete retinal vessels were not visible (vascularized medullary field) were compared with those at a field approximately one papillary diameter below the ONH (nonvascularized extramedullary field). The effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) on SLDF measurements was studied by elevating the IOP manometrically in both rabbit and monkey eyes. Retinal and choroidal blood flow measurements using the microsphere technique and an SLDF measurements were performed simultaneously in the same rabbit eye before and 30 min after 0.3 mg/kg intravenous injection of lomerizine, a calcium antagonist, or intravitreal injection of 20 microl of 10(-6) M endothelin-1.RESULTS: The blood flow measurement with an SLDF (SLDF flow) obtained from the medullary field in rabbits were 304 +/- 63 in an arbitrary unit (n = 24), while 392 +/- 39 in the extramedullary field. SLDF flow did not significantly changed by changes in IOP when it was below 50 mmHg, significantly decreasing with IOP elevation above that level in rabbits and a similar tendency was also seen in monkeys. It showed a significant correlation with retinal blood flow measured by the microsphere technique (r = 0.596, P < 0.0001) in rabbits; no correlation was found with the choroidal blood flow rate (r = 0.021, P > 0.1).CONCLUSIONS: SLDF measurements is thought to mainly reflect retinal circulation in rabbits and monkeys.

ophthalmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry (SLDF) to measure retinal blood flow in living rabbit and monkey eyes and compare it with the microsphere technique. Specifically, the main objectives of the study are:

1. **Verify the measurement accuracy of SLDF under different conditions**: Observe the changes in SLDF measurement values by changing the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and verify its stability under different intraocular pressures.
2. **Compare the measurement results of SLDF and the microsphere technique**: Use SLDF and the microsphere technique simultaneously in the same eye to measure the blood flow in the retina and choroid to evaluate whether the retinal blood flow measured by SLDF mainly reflects the retinal circulation.
3. **Study the measurement differences of SLDF in different regions**: Conduct SLDF measurements in the vascularized medullary field and non - vascularized extramedullary field of rabbit eyes respectively and compare the differences.

### Main research methods:
- **Animal models**: Guinea pigs and cynomolgus monkeys were used.
- **Drug treatment**: The calcium channel blocker Lomerizine and Endothelin - 1 were used to increase and decrease retinal blood flow respectively.
- **Measurement methods**: Measure retinal blood flow parameters (such as flow and velocity) by SLDF and measure the blood flow in the retina and choroid by the microsphere technique.

### Main findings:
- **The retinal blood flow measured by SLDF is significantly correlated with the results measured by the microsphere technique**: There is a significant correlation between the retinal blood flow measured by SLDF and the retinal blood flow rate measured by the microsphere technique (correlation coefficient \(r = 0.596\), \(P < 0.0001\)), but there is no significant correlation with the choroid blood flow rate (correlation coefficient \(r = 0.021\), \(P>0.1\)).
- **Changes in SLDF measurement under different intraocular pressures**: When the intraocular pressure is lower than 50 mmHg, there is no significant change in the retinal blood flow measured by SLDF; when the intraocular pressure is higher than 50 mmHg, the retinal blood flow measured by SLDF decreases significantly.
- **Differences in SLDF measurement in different regions**: The SLDF flow and velocity measured in the vascularized medullary field are 304 ± 63 and 1.0 ± 0.2 (arbitrary units) respectively, while the SLDF flow and velocity measured in the non - vascularized extramedullary field are 392 ± 39 and 1.3 ± 0.1 (arbitrary units) respectively.

### Conclusion:
The SLDF measurement mainly reflects the retinal circulation rather than the choroid circulation. This indicates that SLDF is an effective non - invasive tool that can be used to evaluate retinal blood flow.