Abstract:It has long been recognized that avian mass loss during breeding could be adaptive, though many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings to investigate the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy and, specifically, test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. Overall, we found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system and instead suggest that mass loss may represent an individually plastic trait that individuals use to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness. It has long been recognized that mass loss during breeding could be adaptive (e.g., by ameliorating the costs of increased parental activity). However, many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction (i.e., a negative effect of high workload during chick provisioning). Despite several studies reporting evidence in support of both hypotheses, the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy are still unclear. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to investigate natural annual and individual variation in body mass and mass loss and to test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. While there was significant annual variation in incubation mass, chick‐rearing mass, and mass change, there were no systematic relationships between mass loss and current breeding success or future fecundity and survival. In addition, we found no evidence of intra‐annual repeatability of mass loss between first and second broods ( = .00) but moderate interannual repeatability of mass loss (R = .61) during first broods, suggesting differences in mass loss under different selective pressures. However, we found no covariation between residual intra‐individual variation in mass loss for first broods and other reproductive or life‐history traits. We therefore found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system: there were no negative relationships between mass loss and either current or future reproduction and survival (local return rate). Our results are consistent with mass loss being an individually plastic trait, with individuals using mass loss to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness within their specific ecological context and relative to their individual quality for a given breeding attempt.

Two tests of a stochastic dynamic programming model of daily singing routines in birds

Flocking behaviour of passerines: a dynamic model for the non-reproductive season

Dawn chorus interpretation differs when using songs or calls: the Dupont’s Lark Chersophilus duponti case

Daily vocal exercise is necessary for peak performance singing in a songbird

Daily and Seasonal Patterns in the Singing Activity of Birds in East China

Impact of environmental factors on the variability of the avian dawn chorus

Dynamic sex-specific responses to synthetic songs in a duetting suboscine passerine

Predictability and chaos in bird vigilant behaviour

Social restructuring during harsh environmental conditions promotes cooperative behaviour in a songbird

Natural Patterns in the Dawn and Dusk Choruses of a Neotropical Songbird in Relation to an Urban Sound Environment

Avian Song over Time: Variability and Stability

Living Together, Singing Together: Revealing Similar Patterns of Vocal Activity in Two Tropical Songbirds Applying BirdNET

Male song structure predicts offspring recruitment to the breeding population in a migratory bird

ENSO, Nest Predation Risk, Food Abundance, and Male Status Fail to Explain Annual Variations in the Apparent Survival Rate of a Migratory Songbird

Absence of female partners can explain the dawn chorus of birds

Adaptive temperature regulation in the little bird in winter: predictions from a stochastic dynamic programming model

Year-round behavioural time budgets of common woodpigeons inferred from acceleration data using machine learning

Analysis of the Optimal Duration of Behavioral Observations Based on an Automated Continuous Monitoring System in Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor): Is One Hour Good Enough?

Variation in diel timing in great tits is affected by the timing of their social mate

Periodic matrix models for seasonal dynamics of structured populations with application to a seabird population

Phenotypic plasticity in mass loss during chick rearing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)