Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the health equity gap between and within countries. Western countries were the first to receive vaccines and mortality was higher among socially deprived, minority and indigenous populations. Surprisingly, many sub-Saharan countries reported low excess mortalities. These countries share experiences with community organization and participation in health. The aim of this article was to analyse if and how this central role of people can promote a successful pandemic response. Methods: This analysis was partly based on local and national experiences shared during an international and Latin American conference on person-and people-centred care in 2021. Additionally, excess mortality data and pandemic control-relevant data, as well as literature on the pandemic response of countries with an unexpected low excess mortality were consulted. Results: Togo, Mongolia, Thailand and Kenya had a seven times lower mean excess mortality for 2020 and 2021 than the United States of America. More successful pandemic responses were observed in settings with experience in managing epidemics like Ebola and HIV, well-established community networks, a national philosophy of mutual aid, financial government assistance, more human resources for primary care and paid community health workers. Discussion: Since trust in authorities and health needs vary greatly, local strategies are needed to complement national and international pandemic responses. Three key levers were identified to promote locally-tailored pandemic management: well-organized communities, community-oriented primary care, and health information systems. An organized community structure stems from a shared ethical understanding of humanity as being interconnected with each other and the environment. This structure facilitates mutual aid and participation in decision making. Community-oriented primary care includes attention for collective community health and ways to improve health from its roots. A health information system supports collective health and health equity analysis by presenting health needs stratified for social deprivation, ethnicity, and community circumstances. Conclusions: The difference in excess mortality between countries during the COVID-19 pandemic and various country experiences demonstrate the potential of the levers in promoting a more just and effective health emergency response. These same levers and strategies can promote more inclusive and socially just health systems.

The precariousness of political management of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic in the search for scientific answers: Calling for prudence in public health emergencies

The Three Steps Needed to End the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bold Public Health Leadership, Rapid Innovations, and Courageous Political Will

The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies

From disease- to people-centred pandemic management: organized communities, community-oriented primary care and health information systems

The role of the social sciences and humanities in pandemic preparedness responses: insights gained from COVID-19, HIV and AIDS and related epidemics

Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management

Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe

Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons towards a more effective response to public health emergencies

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Revisiting COVID-19 policies: 10 evidence-based recommendations for where to go from here

Declining Public Health Protections within Autocratic Regimes: Impact on Global Public Health Security, Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics

To Procrastinate or Not to Procrastinate: A Retrospective Study of the Optimal Timing of Containing the Global Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Priorities for global access to life-saving interventions during public health emergencies: Crisis nationalism, solidarity or charity?

Comparative strategic approaches to COVID-19 in Africa: Balancing public interest with civil liberties

Innovative strategies to promote global health: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic

Sociopolitical Diagnostic Tools to Understand National and Local Response Capabilities and Vulnerabilities to Epidemics and Guide Research into How to Improve the Global Response to Pathogens

Optimal control of the COVID-19 pandemic: controlled sanitary deconfinement in Portugal

A weapon to fight against pervasive Omicron: systematic actions transiting to pre-COVID normal

Collision of Fundamental Human Rights and the Right to Health Access During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 research: pandemic versus "paperdemic", integrity, values and risks of the "speed science"

COVID-19 and beyond: a call for action and audacious solidarity to all the citizens and nations, it is humanity’s fight [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]