Abstract:Introduction: The current molecular classification of breast cancer has significantly improved treatment targeting and disease prognosis. However, the heterogeneity among subtypes also poses a limitation when proposing new targets that integrate common biological processes, hindering their applicability across the entire spectrum of the disease. In that sense, it is essential to gain a deeper understanding of the similarities and common mechanisms involved in the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and biological processes among the different breast cancer subtypes that could potentially impact the presentation of clinically significant variables in Colombian patients diagnosed at the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Methods: We included 97 women diagnosed with breast cancer at the NCI in Colombia. From each patient, we collected tumor biopsy and adjacent non-tumoral tissue for RNA extraction and sequencing (RNA-seq). A comparative analysis of DEGs and gene set enrichment (GSE) was performed between tumor tissue and its corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissue for each subtype independently to identify common DEGs and enriched biological processes. Shared over- and under-expressed genes in at least two subtypes were tested for their association with clinically significant prognostic variables. Results: Among breast cancer subtypes, ER-/HER2+ and ER-/HER2- tumors showed the highest number of shared DEGs (22 genes), of which 19 were over-expressed and 3 under-expressed. In contrast, GSE analysis revealed a high proportion of shared biological processes (5), molecular functions (3), and cellular component classification (11) between ER+/HER2+ and ER-/HER2+ tumors, corresponding to mechanisms involved in tissue homeostasis and extracellular matrix structural constituents. Furthermore, the association with clinically significant prognostic variables was assessed for 22 over-expressed genes and 9 under-expressed genes shared in at least two subtypes. Of this set of 31 genes, 9 were significantly associated with the degree of tumor differentiation measured by the Bloom-Richardson (BR) score. Interestingly, tumor suppressor genes like ADAMTS18 showed a decline in expression as the BR score increased (fold-change (FC) in BR I: 14 vs BR II: 11; BR III: 5, p-value: 0.028). Conversely, oncogenes like EFNA4 showed the opposite trend, with an increase in expression as the BR score also increased (FC in BR I: 9 vs. BR II: 11 vs. BR III: 17, p-value: 0.019). Another identified shared over-expressed gene, JPT1, which is involved in β-catenin signaling, was found to be associated not only with higher BR scores but also with a higher proliferation index Ki67 (FC in <20%: 16.5 vs. ≥20%: 23; p-value: 0.05). Conclusions: Despite the high degree of molecular heterogeneity among subtypes, it is still possible to identify shared over and under-expressed genes in at least 2 subtypes with significant prognostic implications in breast cancer subtypes. Citation Format: Laura Rey-Vargas, Lina Maria Bejarano, Diego Felipe Ballen-Lozano, Silvia J. Serrano-Gomez. Shared gene expression pattern among breast cancer subtypes and its association with prognostic variables in Colombian patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl) nr C101.

Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets

Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications

Reassessment of Reliability and Reproducibility for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtyping

Distinct molecular mechanisms underlying clinically relevant subtypes of breast cancer: gene expression analyses across three different platforms

Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study

Expression and methylation patterns partition luminal-A breast tumors into distinct prognostic subgroups

Integrative Analysis of ATAC-Seq and RNA-Seq through Machine Learning Identifies 10 Signature Genes for Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes

Differential Chromatin Accessibility and Transcriptional Dynamics Define Breast Cancer Subtypes and Their Lineages

Gene Expression Classification of Colon Cancer into Molecular Subtypes: Characterization, Validation, and Prognostic Value

Molecular subtypes of breast cancer are associated with characteristic DNA methylation patterns

Identification of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Integrating Genomic Analysis with the Immune Microenvironment

Distinct Multiethnic Genome-Wide Alterations in Breast Cancer Using Paraffin Embedded Samples: Preliminary Analysis.

A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers

The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups

Abstract 4543: Identification of tumor-specific breast cancer expression subtypes and subtype-specific drug response prediction

High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses

Comprehensive Landscape of Subtype-Specific Coding and Non-Coding RNA Transcripts in Breast Cancer

Abstract C101: Shared gene expression pattern among breast cancer subtypes and its association with prognostic variables in Colombian patients

Molecular intrinsic versus clinical subtyping in breast cancer: A comprehensive review

Molecular subtyping improves breast cancer diagnosis in the Copenhagen Breast Cancer Genomics Study

Predicting features of breast cancer with gene expression patterns