Abstract:Problem statement. Fraud in the conduct of computer testing is a significant risk factor for incorrect assessment of learning outcomes. Modern technical means (smartphones, smart watches, etc.) allow test-takers to freely use the database of correct answers to the test tasks created during the preparation for the exam or purchased on the side of the database during the control. This circumstance reduces the reliability of computer testing. Methodology. Among the types of testing questions offered by Moodle, calculated tasks with the ability to program the correct answer and random number generators for generating initial data stand out. Such tasks, while maintaining the meaning, allow you to create an almost unlimited number of options for initial data and correct answers. The numerical answer entered from the keyboard is compared with the calculated correct value and a decision is made on the assessment. The capabilities of the built-in programming language of the correct answer, in particular, are limited by the absence of a conditional operator, which narrows the range of possible tasks to be solved. Results. The authors, using the declarative principle of programming, proposed sequences of statements in the built-in programming language of the Moodle computed question that implement the traditional if statement. The proposed method allows you to expand the capabilities of the programming language built into the question, but does not make it universal due to the lack of loop operators. Another type of Moodle test item, “Formulas”, is mentioned. Known methods of its programming provide even more opportunities for creating task options. The results of the experiment are presented. Conclusion. The use of calculated tasks with random input data will reduce the number of cases of fraud during computer testing and will allow, in some cases, to test not only knowledge, but also skills.

Three Response Types for Broadening the Conception of Mathematical Problem Solving in Computerized Tests

Design of tasks for assessment of generalization abilities of preservice teachers of elementary school mathematics

Student approaches to generating mathematical examples: comparing e-assessment and paper-based tasks

Applying Unidimensional and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models in Testlet-Based Reading Assessment

Design principles for final answer assessment in linear algebra: implications for digital testing

GeoQA: A Geometric Question Answering Benchmark Towards Multimodal Numerical Reasoning

Evaluating Different Scoring Methods for Multiple Response Items Providing Partial Credit

How do open-ended problems promote mathematical creativity? A reflection of bare mathematics problem and contextual problem

Using language models in the implicit automated assessment of mathematical short answer items

Relations between Generalization, Reasoning and Combinatorial Thinking in Solving Mathematical Open-Ended Problems within Mathematical Contest

Computer-based and paper-and-pencil tests: A study in calculus for STEM majors

Towards Tractable Mathematical Reasoning: Challenges, Strategies, and Opportunities for Solving Math Word Problems

An accurate and practical method for assessing science and engineering problem-solving expertise

Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Models

Reforming Physics Exams Using Openly Accessible Large Isomorphic Problem Banks created with the assistance of Generative AI: an Explorative Study

COMET: "Cone of experience" enhanced large multimodal model for mathematical problem generation

MATHWELL: Generating Educational Math Word Problems Using Teacher Annotations

Exploring the Role of Metacognition in Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking and Knowledge in Mathematics: A Comparative Study of Regression and Neural Networks

GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving

Moodle calculated questions as a means of testing knowledge and skills

UTMath: Math Evaluation with Unit Test via Reasoning-to-Coding Thoughts