Abstract:Morphology‐based taxonomic research frequently applies LMM in skulls to quantify species distinctions but the choice of which measurements to collect generally relies on the expertise of the investigators, a practice that may ignore less obvious discriminatory characters. After a comparison with GMM, we found high measurement redundancy in LMM protocols, possibly resulting in relatively high allometry but low discriminatory performance, as opposed to correct discriminatory performance in GMM even after allometric correction. These findings suggest that taxonomic measurement protocols might benefit from GMM‐based pilot studies, because this offers the option of differentiating allometric and non‐allometric shape differences between species, which can then inform on the development of the easier‐to‐apply LMM protocols. Morphology‐based taxonomic research frequently applies linear morphometrics (LMM) in skulls to quantify species distinctions. The choice of which measurements to collect generally relies on the expertise of the investigators or a set of standard measurements, but this practice may ignore less obvious or common discriminatory characteristics. In addition, taxonomic analyses often ignore the potential for subgroups of an otherwise cohesive population to differ in shape purely due to size differences (or allometry). Geometric morphometrics (GMM) is more complicated as an acquisition technique but can offer a more holistic characterization of shape and provides a rigorous toolkit for accounting for allometry. In this study, we used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to assess the discriminatory performance of four published LMM protocols and a 3D GMM dataset for three clades of antechinus known to differ subtly in shape. We assessed discrimination of raw data (which are frequently used by taxonomists); data with isometry (i.e., overall size) removed; and data after allometric correction (i.e., with nonuniform effects of size removed). When we visualized the principal component analysis (PCA) plots, we found that group discrimination among raw data was high for LMM. However, LMM datasets may inflate PC variance accounted in the first two PCs, relative to GMM. GMM discriminated groups better after isometry and allometry were removed in both PCA and LDA. Although LMM can be a powerful tool to discriminate taxonomic groups, we show that there is substantial risk that this discrimination comes from variation in size, rather than shape. This suggests that taxonomic measurement protocols might benefit from GMM‐based pilot studies, because this offers the option of differentiating allometric and nonallometric shape differences between species, which can then inform on the development of the easier‐to‐apply LMM protocols.

Comparison of Donkey, Pony, and Horse Dorsal Profiles and Head Shapes Using Geometric Morphometrics

Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics

Studying the Shape Variations of the Back, the Neck, and the Mandibular Angle of Horses Depending on Specific Feeding Postures Using Geometric Morphometrics

Difference Analysis of Body Proportion in Different Uses Horse Breeds

Geometric morphometric evaluation of mandibles of four sheep breeds: Bardoka, İvesi, Polish Mountain sheep and Turcana

Effect of pony morphology and hay feeding methods on back and neck postures

The relative performance of geometric morphometrics and linear‐based methods in the taxonomic resolution of a mammalian species complex

Genetic Parameter Estimates for Body Conformation Traits Using Composite Index, Principal Component, and Factor Analysis.

Comparative analysis of haematological, biochemical and nutritional parameters of Dezhou donkey with healthy and weak foals (<i>Equus asinus</i>)

Breeding Value Estimation Based on Morphological Evaluation of the Maremmano Horse Population through Factor Analysis

Exploring body morphometry and weight prediction in Ganjam goats in India through principal component analysis

Estimation of Liveweight from Body Measurements through Best Fitted Regression Model in Dezhou Donkey Breed

Genetic analysis of geometric morphometric 3D visuals of French jumping horses

Comparison of Skull Morphometric Characteristics of Simmental and Holstein Cattle Breeds

A Measurement Method for Body Parameters of Mongolian Horses Based on Deep Learning and Machine Vision

Pony feeding management: the role of morphology and hay feeding methods on intake rate, ingestive behaviors and mouth shaping

Metagenomic analysis reveals shared and distinguishing features in horse and donkey gut microbiome and maternal resemblance of the microbiota in hybrid equids

Application of Multivariate Principal Component Factor Analysis to Morphological Characterization of Camels in Ethiopia

Exploring Genetic Markers: Mitochondrial DNA and Genomic Screening for Biodiversity and Production Traits in Donkeys

Comparison of Performance, Serum Biochemical Indices, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Male and Female Growing Donkeys

The Application of 3D Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics towards Refinement of the Piglet Grimace Scale