Resilience to Stress and Adversity: A Narrative Review of the Role of Positive Affect
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s391403
IF: 3.974
2024-05-15
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Luke A Egan, 1 Haeme RP Park, 1, 2, &ast Janine Lam, 1, &ast Justine M Gatt 1– 3 1 Centre for Wellbeing, Resilience and Recovery, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 2 School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia; 3 Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Justine M Gatt, Email The modern conception of mental health encompasses not only mental illness but also mental wellbeing, including positive emotional states and other forms of positive experience. Accordingly, research on resilience — that is, recovery or adaptation following adversity – has recently expanded to consider the roles of positive affect in the resilience process. To review this research, we performed a keyword search of all peer-reviewed journals within the American Psychological Association's PsycInfo database, retrieving all studies of positive affect in the context of resilience. These studies measured positive affect either as the outcome of the resilience process or as a resilience resource in its own right. With positive affect as the outcome, the literature suggests that various resilience resources can promote positive affect following a stressor, especially positive personality traits (eg, hope, optimism, self-compassion) and supportive interpersonal connections. With positive affect as a resilience resource, the literature suggests that higher levels of positive affect may protect individuals from the impact of stress on a number of outcomes, such as depression and trauma symptoms. In all, the reviewed research showcases a wide range of stressors, resources, and outcomes, and there are numerous openings for future discoveries in this promising area of inquiry. Keywords: positive emotion, wellbeing, happiness, stress, trauma, adversity Until recent decades, mental health was measured and studied primarily in terms of mental illness, negative emotional states, and other forms of psychological distress or dysfunction, along with the risk factors that predict or exacerbate such conditions. But more recently, mental health has been increasingly recognised as comprising two related but distinct domains, namely mental illness and mental wellbeing. 1–4 Thus, the modern conception of mental health acknowledges not only negative symptoms but also positive outcomes, and with this broadened view have come a range of studies on protective factors that predict or accentuate favourable mental health trajectories. Consequently, there is now a large literature on resilience , and the various attributes that support positive mental functioning in the aftermath of stress, trauma, and other forms of adversity. Initially, even studies of protective factors examined them mostly in relation to negative outcomes (eg, studies of personality traits that may predict lower levels of depression), but more recent research has considered predictors of positive attributes too, especially positive affect and related variables (eg, happiness, subjective wellbeing). The overlapping fields of resilience and positive affect have produced numerous studies that shed light on how resilience can be both enabled by positive affect and measured in terms of it, and the present paper offers a narrative review of these connections. The concept of resilience has been defined and studied in various ways, and we must begin by clarifying it for the present purposes. Across all definitions of resilience, there is reference to the phenomenon of regaining (if not maintaining or even increasing) one's mental health following a stressor (eg, a challenge, hardship, or aversive experience). 5 Here we are using the broad scientific definition of "stressor" (ie, any experience that involves a challenge, threat, or hardship), as well as the broadest definition of "mental health", encompassing all aspects – positive and negative – of an individual's psychological health and functioning. Therefore, studying resilience requires investigations into why some people rebound from or adapt to stressors more easily than others, or experience stressors as less challenging or distressing from the outset, and why certain individuals demonstrate improvements in their mental health even after highly stressful or traumatic experiences (eg, posttraumatic growth 6 ). In addressing these research questions, a recent systematic review of resilience interventions notes that resilience has been operationally defined in one of three ways: as an outcome , as a process , and as a trait . 7 The outcome approach defines resilience as favourable mental outcomes at a specif -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary