Comparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen test for immune status to Varicella Zoster virus

Tung-Chia Li,Isobel Rutherford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-0786(88)90003-0
1988-12-01
Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease
Abstract:To determine the immune status to Varicella Zoster virus (VZV), a simple rapid method such as an enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) is needed as an alternative to the VZV fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen test (VZV-FAMA). With the VZV-FAMa (Viran Clinical Diagnostics, Stevensville, MI), a titer of ≥ 1:2 suggests previous exposure to VZV (positive) whereas < 1:2 suggests susceptibility to VZV (negative). Two EIA kits, Varicelisa® and Varicella STAT® (M.A. Bioproducts, Walkersville, MD) were compared with VZV-FAMA and with each other. The Varicelisa is a 3 h test whereas the Varicella STAT® is a 1 h test due to substrate differences. There were 78 positive and 24 negative sera by VZV-FAMA from 102 patients. Varicelisa® agreed with VZV-FAMA in 94 patients (92%); 71 positive and 23 negative. For Varicella STAT®, 88 sera (86·2%) agreed with VZV-FAMA assay; 65 positive, 23 negative. The sensitivity and specificity of the Varicelisa® were 91% (7178) and 95·8% (2324); of Varicella STAT® 83·3% (6578) and 95·8% (2324) respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?