Description of vaccination coverage and hesitancy obtained by epidemiological survey of children born in 2017-2018, in Belo Horizonte and Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Taynãna César Simões,Orozimbo Henriques Campos Neto,Ana Paula França,José Cássio de Moraes,ICV 2020 Group,Adriana Ilha da Silva,Alberto Novaes Ramos Jr,Andrea de Nazaré Marvão Oliveira,Antonio Fernando Boing,Carla Magda Allan Santos Domingues,Consuelo Silva de Oliveira,Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel,Ione Aquemi Guibu,Isabelle Ribeiro Barbosa Mirabal,Jaqueline Caracas Barbosa,Jaqueline Costa Lima,Karin Regina Luhm,Karlla Antonieta Amorim Caetano,Luisa Helena de Oliveira Lima,Maria Bernadete de Cerqueira Antunes,Maria da Gloria Teixeira,Maria Denise de Castro Teixeira,Maria Fernanda de Sousa Oliveira Borges,Rejane Christine de Sousa Queiroz,Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel,Rita Barradas Barata,Roberta Nogueira Calandrini de Azevedo,Sandra Maria do Valle Leone de Oliveira,Sheila Araújo Teles,Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama,Sotero Serrate Mengue,Valdir Nascimento,Wildo Navegantes de Araújo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231188.especial2.en
2024-08-23
Abstract:Objective: To describe vaccination coverage and hesitation for the basic children's schedule in Belo Horizonte and Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Methods: Population-based epidemiological surveys performed from 2020 to 2022, which estimated vaccine coverage by type of immunobiological product and full schedule (valid and ministered doses), according to socioeconomic strata; and reasons for vaccination hesitancy. Results: Overall coverage with valid doses and vaccination hesitancy for at least one vaccine were, respectively, 50.2% (95%CI 44.1;56.2) and 1.6% (95%CI 0.9;2.7), in Belo Horizonte (n = 1,866), and 64.9% (95%CI 56.9;72.1) and 1.0% (95%CI 0.3;2.8), in Sete Lagoas (n = 451), with differences between socioeconomic strata. Fear of severe reactions was the main reason for vaccination hesitancy. Conclusion: Coverage was identified as being below recommended levels for most vaccines. Disinformation should be combated in order to avoid vaccination hesitancy. There is a pressing need to recover coverages, considering public health service access and socioeconomic disparities. Main results: Vaccination coverage of children up to 4 years old was 50.2% in Belo Horizonte, and 64.9% in Sete Lagoas. Fear of severe reactions and believing that vaccination against eradicated diseases is unnecessary were the main reasons for vaccination hesitancy. Implications for services: Recovery of high vaccination coverage among children, considering public health service access conditions and socioeconomic inequities. Acting on reasons for hesitancy that can assist in targeting actions. Perspectives: The multifactorial context of vaccination hesitancy demands the development of health education strategies to raise awareness about child immunization.