Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is viewed in the Chinese situation. The paper views CSR as an endogenous motivation for corporate social behaviour. The intended contributions of this paper are twofold. On the one hand, the authors intend to collect first‐hand data to understand the current status of Chinese managers' cognitions of CSR. On the other hand the paper intends to analyse the differences which exist in managers' cognitions on CSR among different kinds of firms in a Chinese context.Design/methodology/approachA random survey was conducted among 157 businessmen using the force‐choice questionnaire, based on the four‐part construct proposed by Carroll. The confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test the construct validity of Carroll's conceptual model with the data sample drawn from Chinese situation. Then correlation, six pairwise t‐tests and MANOVA test were conducted for the purpose of this study.FindingsChinese managers' cognition of CSR is found to be consistent with the four‐component construct. A relatively strong preference toward economic component has been examined. The results present a significant negative correlation between economic cognition and all three of its non‐economic counterparts. No significant cognitive differences have been verified between firms with different characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper initially examined the cognition of Chinese managers toward CSR. Chinese managers are viewed as having an important role in decision making on social issues. However, how to promote the managers' cognition of CSR is needed for future research which will also examine the internal driving mechanism of CSR.Originality/valueThere has not been a great deal of empirical research done in the field of social responsibility in China. This study is a starting point for those who seek to understand the economic and sociological aspects of mainland Chinese business.

Cultural Influence, Questionnaire Formation and Manager Response in Sino-American International Joint Ventures

Cross-Cultural Differences In Conflict Management An Inductive Study Of Chinese And American Managers

Managerial Psychological Strategies for Sino‐Foreign Joint Ventures

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

Study on Managerial Skill Utilization in the Sino-Foreign Joint Venture Corporations

Differences in the Organizational Context for Managerial Career Progress among Chinese State-owned, Sino-foreign Joint Venture, and Japanese Corporations: A Comparative Study

A Quantitative Study of Face Negotiation Behaviors in Intercultural Conflicting Context

The moderating effects of active and agreeable conflict management styles on cultural intelligence and cross-cultural adjustment

Strategic, Organizational, And Cultural Fit: Effects On Performance In China-U.S. Joint Ventures

Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence in Mainland China

Differences in Career Decision-Making Profiles Between American and Chinese University Students

Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents

Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research Dispositional and Situational Determinants

SOME EVIDENCE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL MANAGERIAL CULTURE

The Agency Problem and the Moderating Role of Culturally Based Management Style on Chinese Managers’ Discretionary Accruals

Influence Model Design of National Culture in Shaping the Organisational Management Cultures: The Case between China and the USA

A Sino-U.S. comparison on workplace flexibility: evidence from multinational firms

FDI and the change of the Chinese culture

The Cultural Context of Expatriate Adaptation: American and Japanese Managers Abroad.