Abstract:The 21st-century construction of a new Chinese political discourse faces the same dilemma that Chinese intellectuals first identified in the 19th century – how to make currently pre-eminent Eurocentric sociocultural, economic and political theory and praxis compatible with Sinocentric sociocultural, economic and political circumstances. At the same time, among Chinese thinkers and strategists, there is a growing self-confidence in China’s ability to play a pre-eminent role in a new post-Western world order. Euro-American faith in the convergence of all societies into a single economic, social and political model defined by the heritage of the European Enlightenment and by Euro-American history is challenged by the emergence of new economic powers outside the Euro-American sphere that resist this model. Eurocentric sociocultural, economic and political theory and praxis must adapt themselves to the emerging paradigms and praxis of an emerging multicultural world order. During a historical period when Afro-Eurasian connectivity was at its height and Ibn Battuta and Marco Polo traversed Eurasia, Ramon Llull (1232–1316) tried in his Ars Magna Generalis (ca. 1274) to develop a new common and consensual terminology and logic of key terms and beliefs that would facilitate mutual understanding among Christians, Jews and Muslims. Shortly thereafter, in his Muqaddimah, Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) elaborated a universal theory of history. Giambattista Vico (1668–1744) tried something similar in Principi di Scienza Nuova d’intorno alla Comune Natura delle Nazioni. The development of new cross-cultural paradigms on a common, multicultural and consensual basis is needed, based on better knowledge of the non-Euro-American languages and cultures involved and more collaborative international and multicultural efforts to promote and build better mutual knowledge and understanding. Mutual respect requires mutual knowledge in order to construct a common and consensual multicultural civic discourse that could lead to more innovative and productive paradigms and more meaningful cooperation.

Epistemic diversity and cross-cultural comparative research: ontology, challenges, and outcomes

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Collaborative Research and Epistemic Appraisal

Crossing the Epistemic Values’ Gap: How Interdisciplinary Science Intersects Deeply Chinese Full Text

Methodological aspects of comparative studies: the context of Chinese philosophy

Understandings and Interpretations in the Cross-Cultural Research

Cross-civilization Studies:Keep Pace with the Orientation of the Academic World and the Academic Frontiers

Chinese and north Americans: An epistemological exploration of intercultural communication

Understanding Otherness' Civilization:Cross-Cultural Dialogue Between Different Ethnic Groups

Individual and collective outcomes of higher education: a comparison of Anglo-American and Chinese approaches

Epistemic Diversity and the Question of Lingua Franca in Science and Philosophy

How to construct a common and consensual multicultural civic discourse

How to Configure the Issues of Comparative Politics: Where Are They From

Epistemic Diversity and Epistemic Advantage: A Comparison of Two Causal Theories in Feminist Epistemology

Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?

Globalization, Divergence and Cultural Fecundity: Seeking Harmony in Diversity through François Jullien’s Transcultural Reflection on China

Comparative education in an age of competition and collaboration

Cross-civilization Study: an Inevitable Trend

Research of Differences in Chinese and Western Thinking in Linguistic and Custom

On the Origin of Transculturalism: A Study Into the Western Academic Context and its Chinese Translation

Opening the door for Eastern-Western Culture Dialogue