Abstract:Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures are becoming increasingly used in clinical trials as primary outcome measures. Investigators are now asking statisticians for advice on how to analyse studies that have used HRQoL outcomes.HRQoL outcomes, like the SF-36, are usually measured on an ordinal scale. However, most investigators assume that there exists an underlying continuous latent variable that measures HRQoL, and that the actual measured outcomes (the ordered categories), reflect contiguous intervals along this continuum. The ordinal scaling of HRQoL measures means they tend to generate data that have discrete, bounded and skewed distributions. Thus, standard methods of analysis such as the t-test and linear regression that assume Normality and constant variance may not be appropriate. For this reason, conventional statistical advice would suggest that non-parametric methods be used to analyse HRQoL data. The bootstrap is one such computer intensive non-parametric method for analysing data. We used the bootstrap for hypothesis testing and the estimation of standard errors and confidence intervals for parameters, in four datasets (which illustrate the different aspects of study design). We then compared and contrasted the bootstrap with standard methods of analysing HRQoL outcomes. The standard methods included t-tests, linear regression, summary measures and General Linear Models.Overall, in the datasets we studied, using the SF-36 outcome, bootstrap methods produce results similar to conventional statistical methods. This is likely because the t-test and linear regression are robust to the violations of assumptions that HRQoL data are likely to cause (i.e. non-Normality). While particular to our datasets, these findings are likely to generalise to other HRQoL outcomes, which have discrete, bounded and skewed distributions. Future research with other HRQoL outcome measures, interventions and populations, is required to confirm this conclusion.

Bootstrap Resampling Approaches for Repeated Measure Designs: Relative Robustness to Sphericity and Normality Violations

Cluster-Robust Bootstrap Inference in Quantile Regression Models

Bootstrap Inference for Panel Data Quantile Regression

Bootstrap tests for simultaneous monotone ordering of effects in a two‐way ANOVA

A Parametric Bootstrap Approach for One-Way ANOVA Under Unequal Variances with Unbalanced Data.

Bootstrap-Based Resampling Methods for Software Reliability Measurement under Small Sample Condition

A Parametric Bootstrap Test for Two-Way ANOVA Model Without Interaction Under Heteroscedasticity

Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method

A New Bootstrap Goodness-of-Fit Test for Normal Linear Regression Models

Incompletely observed nonparametric factorial designs with repeated measurements: A wild bootstrap approach

Multiple Comparisons of Treatment Against Control under Unequal Variances Using Parametric Bootstrap

Bootstrap Inference for Hawkes and General Point Processes

The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)

Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for general MANOVA

Parametric Boostrap and Objective Bayesian Testing for Heteroscedastic One-Way ANOVA

Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted F-tests when sphericity is violated: which procedure is best?

Parametric Bootstrap Procedures for Three-Factor ANOVA and Multiple Comparison Procedures with Unequal Group Variances

Bootstrap LM Tests for Spatial Dependence in Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects

Bootstrap Matching: a robust and efficient correction for non-random A/B test, and its applications

A novel bootstrap goodness-of-fit test for normal linear regression models

Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: The case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data