Abstract:Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is widely adopted in a variety of fields of information fusion. Nevertheless, it is still an open issue about how to avoid the counter-intuitive results to combine the conflicting evidences. In order to overcome this problem, an improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on similarity measure and belief function entropy is proposed. First, the credibility degree of the evidences and their corresponding globe credibility degree are calculated on account of the modified cosine similarity measure of the basic probability assignment. Next, according to the globe credibility degree of the evidences, the primitive evidences are divided into two categories, namely, the reliable evidences and the unreliable evidences. In addition, for strengthening the positive effect of the reliable evidences and alleviating the negative impact of the unreliable evidences, a reward function and a penalty function are designed, respectively, to measure the information volume of the different types of the evidences by taking advantage of the Deng entropy function. Then, the weight value that obtained from the first step is modified by making use of the measured information volume. Finally, the modified weights of the evidences are applied for adjusting the body of the evidences before using the Dempster’s combination rule. A numerical example is provided to illustrate that the proposed method is reasonable and efficient in dealing with the conflicting evidences with better convergence. The results show that the proposed method is not only efficient, but also reliable. It outperforms other related methods which can recognise the target more accurate by 98.92%.

Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence

Combining Belief Functions Based on Three Mechanisms: Average, Multiplication and Intersection

Sensor Data Fusion Based on a New Conflict Measure

Modified Evidence Combination Method Based on Pignistic Probability Distance and Uncertainty Degree

Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts

Belief Function to Probability: A Tradeoff Between Easy Decision-Making and High Risk

A Modified Belief Entropy in Dempster-Shafer Framework

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

When and to What Extent Should Two Belief Functions Be Discounted?

An Evidence Combination Approach Based on Fuzzy Discounting

An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making

New Measurement Methods of Evidence Conflict Based on Binary Function

Evidence Combination Based on Singular Value

A Conflict Evidence Fusion Method Based on Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity and the Belief Entropy

Conflicting evidence combination from the perspective of networks

New Evidence Combination Method Based on Redistribution of Global Conflict

A New and Efficient Evidence Combination Method Based on Conjunctive Set and Disjunctive Set Weighting and Its Application

A New Fast Combination Method of Conflict Evidences Based on Model Modification

Combining belief functions taking into consideration error in judgement

Multi-sensor data fusion method based on divergence measure and probability transformation belief factor

Belief function combination and conflict management