Abstract:Background: Orthopaedics is the least gender-diverse medical specialty. Research suggests that the use of gendered language can contribute to workforce disparity and that gender-neutral language supports the inclusion and advancement of women, but the degree to which gender-neutral language is used by academic departments in what typically is a department's highest position (department chair) has not been characterized. Questions/purposes: (1) Is the proportion of department websites that use the term chairman (as opposed to chair) greater in orthopaedics than in five other surgical and medical specialties? (2) Are departments led by chairs who are women less likely to use "chairman" than those led by men, and does this vary by specialty? Methods: Seven hundred fourteen official websites of orthopaedic, neurosurgery, general surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology departments affiliated with 129 allopathic medical schools were screened. Any use of the term chairman on title pages, welcome messages, and faculty profile pages was identified using a Boyer-Moore string-search algorithm and terms were classified based on their location on the site. The overall use of the term chairman was compared by specialty and gender of the chair. Results: Sixty percent of orthopaedic department websites (71 of 119) used the term chairman at least once, a proportion higher than that of pediatrics (36% [46 of 128]; OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.63; p < 0.001), internal medicine (31% [38 of 122]; OR 0.030; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.53; p < 0.001), and obstetrics and gynecology (29% [37 of 126]; OR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48; p < 0.001), but no different than that of neurosurgery (57% [54 of 94]; OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.6; p = 0.74) and general surgery (55% [69 of 125]; OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.4; p = 0.48). Across disciplines, departments whose chairs were women were much less likely to use the term chairman than departments whose chairs were men (14% [17 of 122] versus 50% [297 of 592]; OR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The frequent use of the term chairman in orthopaedics, coupled with the preference of women to use the term chair, suggests considerable room for growth in the use of gender-equal language in orthopaedics. Clinical relevance: Our current efforts to increase the number of women in orthopaedics may be undermined by gendered language, which can create and reinforce gendered culture in the field. Electing to use gender-neutral leadership titles, while a relatively small step in the pursuit of a more gender-equal environment, presents an immediate and no-cost way to support a more inclusive culture and counteract unconscious gender bias. Future studies should explore the individual attitudes of chairs regarding the use of gendered titles and identify additional ways in which biases may manifest; for example, the use of gendered language in interpersonal communications and the presence of unconscious bias in leadership evaluations. Continued efforts to understand implicit bias in orthopaedics can guide actionable strategies for counteracting gendered stereotypes of the specialty, in turn aiding initiatives to recruit and promote women in the field.

Do we need the word ‘woman’ in healthcare?

Language Matters: Exploring Preferred Terms for Diverse Populations

Gender‐inclusive language in midwifery and perinatal services: A guide and argument for justice

He/She/They - gender inclusivity in developing and using health-related questionnaires: a scoping review

A 'smear campaign' against patient-excluded policy changes: a reflection on the language used in cervical screening programmes

What words should we use to talk about weight? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies examining preferences for weight‐related terminology

Conceptual anatomy of the female genitalia using text mining and implications for patient care

Evaluation of Gender-Identity Inclusive Language Used in U.S. Hospital Breastfeeding Education Materials

"What do they mean?" a systematic review on the interpretation, usage and acceptability of "they"

Stimulating fertility awareness: the importance of getting the language right

"We hear and we fear" - Insights of 1203 Women on Personnel Conversations During Cesarean Delivery

Should Mother Baby Units be renamed Parent Baby Units? A critical reflection on gendered language in perinatal psychiatry

The Power of Language in Hospital Care for Pregnant and Birthing People: A Vision for Change

How to Reduce Stigma and Bias in Clinical Communication: a Narrative Review

Gender inclusive language on public-facing maternity services websites in England

Understanding sex and gender: concepts and terminology for gender affirming care

How female and male physicians' communication is perceived differently

Language Matters: Is There Gender Bias in Internal Medicine Grand Rounds Introductions?

What does preconception health mean to people? A public consultation on awareness and use of language

Guiding Principles for Writing About Immigrants and Immigrant Health

Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?