Alterations of Gut Microbiota Prior to Changes of Paneth Cell‐antimicrobial Peptides in High Fat‐induced Obese Mice

Xiulan Guo,Jinchao Li,Renyong Tang,Wei Liu,Zhenhua Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1166.5
2016-04-01
The FASEB Journal
Abstract:It is under intensive argument about the reciprocal relationship between gut microbiota and the altered intestinal metabolic and inflammatory status in the obese state. Gut microbiota composition and Paneth cells is closely associated, especially in obesity. This study aimed to investigate the mutual interaction between the Paneth cell‐produced antimicrobial peptides expression and shift of the intestinal microbiota in obesity. Eight male C57BL/6 mice were fed a low fat diet (LF, 10%) as the control and 24 animals were fed a high fat diet (HF, 60%) and sacrificed sequentially with 8, 12, 16 weeks of feeding. The expression of antimicrobial peptides and the composition of gut microbiota were determined at each stage. The mice with 8‐wk HF feeding had higher fat percentage and significant changes of the gut microbiota comparing to the LF control group ( p < 0.05). The abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes from 8‐ to 16‐wk HF feeding were steady, with a higher abundance of Firmicutes and a lower of Bacteroidetes . However, 8‐wk HF diet feeding did not changed the Paneth antimicrobial peptides: lysozyme (LYZ), α‐defensin 5, and RegIIIγ ( p > 0.05), but reduced LYZ and RegIIIγ mRNA expression was observed in animals with 12‐ and 16‐wk HF feeding (p < 0.05), and the results for LYZ protein level, measured by immunohistochemistry, also indicated a decrease after 16‐wk HF feeding. These results indicated that the high fat diet initially alters the profile of gut microbiota in obese mice, and changes in the expression of antimicrobial peptides occurs secondary to alterations in the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Support or Funding Information This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.31401488), USDA grants (2014‐67017‐21762 and MAS00454), and Deans Incentive Grant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?