Abstract:In the general population, selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects (AEs) than NSAIDs, but whether they are associated with exacerbations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial.The aim of this study was to review published and unpublished findings to determine whether the use of COX-2 inhibitors increased the risk for IBD exacerbations relative to placebo in the treatment of IBD.A systematic search of MEDLINE (1966-July 2007), EMBASE (1980-July 2007), the Cochrane Library (2007 Issue 4), US Food and Drug Administration records, and data on file at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Pfizer US Pharmaceutical Group, and Merck & Co., Inc., using the search terms celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib, lumiracoxib, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and inflammatory bowel disease, was performed to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of 5 COX-2 inhibitors in patients with IBD. The publications were fully reviewed for quality. Data on trial design, patient characteristics, intervention drugs, dosages, and outcomes were collected using a predetermined data-extraction form. A meta-analysis was performed based on the publications that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.Of 588 studies identified in the electronic search, 574 were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts. Fourteen related to the use of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with IBD were reviewed. Two randomized, controlled trials comparing COX-2 inhibitors with placebo were identified. In the first trial, 82 patients were randomized to receive etoricoxib (60-120 mg/d) and 77 to receive placebo. The exacerbation rates were 10.5% (8/76) in the active-treatment group and 11.4% (8/70) in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37-2.32). In the second trial, 112 patients were treated with celecoxib (200 mg BID) and 110 received placebo. The exacerbation rates were 3.7% (4/107) in the celecoxib group and 2.7% (3/110) in the placebo group (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.17-3.18). Of these patients, 5 were lost to follow-up because of AEs. In the meta-analysis comparing COX-2 inhibitors and placebo, the RR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.39-1.88). No statistically significant differences in IBD relapse rates were found between COX-2 inhibitors and placebo.The results from this meta-analysis suggest that insufficient data were available to determine the impact of COX-2 inhibitors on IBD exacerbations. The relatively smaller risk for AEs makes the short-term use of COX-2 inhibitors potentially attractive, but the long-term benefits remain unclear. Further studies with sound methodology and large sample sizes are needed to evaluate the tolerability of COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of IBD.

Upper gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib): a case/non-case study from the French Pharmacovigilance Database

COX-2 inhibitors and arterial hypertension: an analysis of spontaneous case reports in the Pharmacovigilance database

Renal effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Coxibs and cardiovascular side-effects: from light to shadow

Rofecoxib and clinically significant upper and lower gastrointestinal events revisited based on documents from recent litigation.

Adverse cardiovascular effects of the coxibs

Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective Cox-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs For The Prevention Of Nsaid-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury

Relative Cardiovascular and Gastrointestinal Safety of Non-selective Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Versus Cyclo-oxygenase-2 Inhibitors

Risks of Colorectal Neoplasms and Cardiovascular Thromboembolic Events after the Combined Use of Selective COX-2 Inhibitors and Aspirin with 5-Year Follow-Up: a Meta-Analysis

114 Combination of a Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 Selective NSAID and a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Prevention of Gastroduodenal Ulcers in Very High Risk Patients: A One-Year, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

PIH21 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IMRECOXIB, CELECOXIB AND DICLOFENAC IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Patients with High Gastrointestinal Risk: Are We There Yet?

Role of Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Exacerbation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Assessing the cardiovascular risk between celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis

Meta-analysis: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are no better than nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with proton pump inhibitors in regard to gastrointestinal adverse events in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Cyclooxygenase selectivity and the risk of gastro-intestinal complications of various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a clinical consideration

Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: Road from Success to Controversy and the Quest for Repurposing

COX-2 inhibition, H. pylori infection and the risk of gastrointestinal complications.

Effects Of Long-Term Rofecoxib On Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Results Of A Randomized Controlled Trial

The risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a multinational perspective

Tolerance to COX-2 inhibitors in children with hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs