The Black-White Test Score Gap

George Farkas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2004.3.2.12

2004-02-01

Contexts

Abstract:The Supreme Court's 2003 decision to uphold affirmative action in college admissions suggests that special treatment may be unnecessary in 25 years. But achieving equality without affirmative action will require overcoming a black-white test score gap that appears as early as preschool and is rooted in child-rearing practices.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Affirmative Action and Precollege Human Capital

Mitra Akhtari,Natalie Bau,Jean-William Laliberté

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210807

2024-01-01

Abstract:Though racial affirmative action (AA) policies are widespread in college admissions, evidence on their effects before college is limited. We study a US Supreme Court ruling that reinstated AA in three states. Using nationwide SAT data, we separately identify positive effects of AA for Whites and underrepresented minorities. Using Texas administrative data, we find that AA narrowed racial gaps in grades, attendance, and college applications. Improvements in minorities’ precollege human capital and college applications are concentrated in the top half of the test score distribution among the students for whom the policy most increases the returns to human capital investment. (JEL H75, I21, I23, I28, J15, J24, K10)

economics
School accountability and the black-white test score gap

S Michael Gaddis,Douglas Lee Lauen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.10.008

Abstract:Since at least the 1960s, researchers have closely examined the respective roles of families, neighborhoods, and schools in producing the black-white achievement gap. Although many researchers minimize the ability of schools to eliminate achievement gaps, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) increased pressure on schools to do so by 2014. In this study, we examine the effects of NCLB's subgroup-specific accountability pressure on changes in black-white math and reading test score gaps using a school-level panel dataset on all North Carolina public elementary and middle schools between 2001 and 2009. Using difference-in-difference models with school fixed effects, we find that accountability pressure reduces black-white achievement gaps by raising mean black achievement without harming mean white achievement. We find no differential effects of accountability pressure based on the racial composition of schools, but schools with more affluent populations are the most successful at reducing the black-white math achievement gap. Thus, our findings suggest that school-based interventions have the potential to close test score gaps, but differences in school composition and resources play a significant role in the ability of schools to reduce racial inequality.
Why test? Talent loss and enrollment loss

Judith R Blau,Stephanie Moller,Lyle V Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.09.002

IF: 2.617

2004-09-01

Social Science Research

Abstract:Among low- and average-scorers on high school achievement tests, whites are less likely than blacks to pursue an education after high school, but among high-scorers on these tests, blacks are less likely to do so. The interpretation is that whites with low or average test scores have low motivation to attend college and that blacks with high scores are handicapped by the lesser quality of high schools they attend. After analyzing the probability of attending any postsecondary institution, results are presented for enrolling in different types of college programs, including bachelors, associates, and a one-year program. When high school rank is substituted for test score, the findings show that high-scoring blacks are not penalized. Finally, when an indicator of educational aspirations is included in the analytical models, race has no independent effect on the likelihood of attending a postsecondary institution.

sociology
Assessing the Potential Impact of a Nationwide Class-Based Affirmative Action System

Alice Xiang,Donald B. Rubin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.03397

2015-09-11

Applications

Abstract:We examine the possible consequences of a change in law school admissions in the United States from an affirmative action system based on race to one based on socioeconomic class. Using data from the 1991-1996 Law School Admission Council Bar Passage Study, students were reassigned attendance by simulation to law school tiers by transferring the affirmative action advantage for black students to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The hypothetical academic outcomes for the students were then multiply-imputed to quantify the uncertainty of the resulting estimates. The analysis predicts dramatic decreases in the numbers of black students in top law school tiers, suggesting that class-based affirmative action is insufficient to maintain racial diversity in prestigious law schools. Furthermore, there appear to be no statistically significant changes in the graduation and bar passage rates of students in any demographic group. The results thus provide evidence that, other than increasing their representation in upper tiers, current affirmative action policies relative to a socioeconomic-based system neither substantially help nor harm minority academic outcomes, contradicting the predictions of the "mismatch" hypothesis, which asserts otherwise.
The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Xiaomei Song,Lianzhen He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-014-0011-z

2015-01-01

Language Testing in Asia

Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.
Can Desegregation Close the Racial Gap in High School Coursework?

Ritika Sethi

2023-07-20

Abstract:This paper examines the interplay between desegregation, institutional bias, and individual behavior in education. Using a game-theoretic model that considers race-heterogeneous social incentives, the study investigates the effects of between-school desegregation on within-school disparities in coursework. The analysis incorporates a segregation measure based on entropy and proposes an optimization-based approach to evaluate the impact of student reassignment policies. The results highlight that Black and Hispanic students in predominantly White schools, despite receiving less encouragement to apply to college, exhibit higher enrollment in college-prep coursework due to stronger social incentives from their classmates' coursework decisions.

General Economics
Diverging Disparities: Race, Parental Income, and Children’s Math Scores, 1960 to 2009

Jordan A. Conwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720963279

IF: 4.619

2021-03-19

Sociology of Education

Abstract:In recent decades, the black–white test score disparity has decreased, and the test score disparity between children of high- versus low-income parents has increased. This study focuses on a comparison that has, to date, fallen between the separate literatures on these diverging trends: black and white students whose parents have similarly low, middle, or high incomes (i.e., same income or race within income). To do so, I draw on three nationally representative data sets on 9th or 10th graders, covering 1960 to 2009, that contain information on students’ math test scores. I find that math test score disparities between black and white students with same-income parents are to black students’ disadvantage. Although these disparities have decreased since 1960, in 2009 they remained substantively large, statistically significant, and largest between children of the highest-income parents. Furthermore, family and school characteristics that scholars commonly use to explain test score disparities by race or income account for markedly decreasing shares of race-within-income disparities over time. The study integrates the literatures on test score disparities by race and income with attention to the historical and continued structural influence of race, net of parental income, on students’ educational experiences and test score outcomes.

education & educational research,sociology
Explicit vs. statistical targeting in affirmative action: Theory and evidence from Chicago's exam schools

Umut Dur,Parag A. Pathak,Tayfun Sönmez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2020.104996

IF: 1.79

2020-05-01

Journal of Economic Theory

Abstract:<p>Prohibitions on using race in affirmative action have spurred a number of admissions systems to adopt race-neutral alternatives that encourage diversity without appearing to explicitly advantage any particular group. The new affirmative action system for Chicago's exam schools reserves seats for students based on their neighborhood and leaves the rest to be assigned via merit. Neighborhoods are divided into four tiers based on an index of socioeconomic disadvantage. At each school, an equal fraction of seats are reserved for each tier. We show that the order in which seats are processed at schools provides an additional lever to explicitly target disadvantaged applicants. We then characterize tier-blind processing rules that do not explicitly discriminate between tiers. Even under these rules, it is possible to favor certain applicants by exploiting the score distribution across tiers, a phenomenon we call statistical targeting. When disadvantaged applicants systematically have lower scores than other applicants, the optimal tier-blind processing order first assigns merit seats and then the tier seats. Our analysis shows that Chicago has been providing an additional boost to applicants from disadvantaged tiers beyond their reserved slots, a benefit comparable to what they received from the 2012 increase in reserve size.</p>

economics
Early Life Environment and Racial Inequality in Education and Earnings in the United States

Kenneth Y. Chay,Jonathan Guryan,Bhashkar Mazumder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2540309

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Chay, Guryan and Mazumder (2009) found substantial racial convergence in AFQT and NAEP scores across cohorts born in the 1960s and early 1970s that was concentrated among blacks in the South. We demonstrated a close tracking between variation in the test score convergence across states and racial convergence in measures of health and hospital access in the years immediately after birth. This study analyzes whether the across-cohort patterns in the black-white education and earnings gaps match those in early life health and test scores already established. It also addresses caveats in the earlier study, such as unobserved selection into taking the AFQT and potential discrepancies between state-of-birth and state-of-test taking. With Census data, we find: i) a significant narrowing across the same cohorts in education gaps driven primarily by a relative increase in the probability of blacks going to college; and ii) a similar convergence in relative earnings that is insensitive to adjustments for employment selection, as well as time and age effects that vary by race and state-of-residence. The variation in racial convergence across birth states matches the patterns in the earlier study. The magnitude of the earnings gains is greater than can be explained by only the black gains in education and test scores for reasonable estimates of the returns to human capital. This suggests that other pre-market, productivity factors also improved across successive cohorts of blacks born in the South between the early 1960s and early 1970s. Finally, our cohort-based hypothesis provides a cohesive explanation for the aggregate patterns in several, previously disconnected literatures.
Privileges, Immunities, and Affirmative Action in Medical Education

Gregory Curfman

Abstract:In Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, the Supreme Court ruled that affirmative action in university admissions, in which an applicant of a particular race or ethnicity receives a plus factor, is unconstitutional. This ruling was based on both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This article argues that a more natural fit as the basis for constitutional analysis would be a different clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, the Privileges or Immunities Clause. In the article, a legal analysis based on the clause is applied to medical school admissions. Depending on whether a fundamental rights reading or an antidiscrimination (equality) reading of the clause is applied, opposite conclusions are reached on the constitutionality of affirmative action in medical school admissions. This analysis demonstrates why affirmative action in admissions--in this case medical school admissions, which directly affect the composition of the Nation's physician workforce--is a complex and difficult constitutional question.
White Attitudes toward Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action

Nancy DiTomaso,Rochelle Parks-Yancy,Corinne Post

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920510380070

2011-04-07

Critical Sociology

Abstract:White attitudes toward equal opportunity and affirmative action are explored through semi-structured interviews with 246 middle and working class respondents from three areas of the USA. Both working and middle class interviewees espouse a consistent and coherent view: that opportunity is widespread for anyone willing to take advantage of it, that facing adverse conditions or obstacles is not a sufficient excuse for lack of success, and that government help in the form of affirmative action gives women and/or minorities unfair advantage over men and/or whites. In the responses, however, we also find that whites apply standards to others about being the ‘best person for the job’ that they do not apply to themselves in their own career histories. Using the interviews with these respondents, we explore the implications of this inconsistency in how whites apply normative standards about what constitutes merit and fairness. This research helps elucidate the meaning of previous research on white racial attitudes.

sociology
Inequality in Reading and Math Skills Forms Mainly before Kindergarten: A Replication, and Partial Correction, of “Are Schools the Great Equalizer?”

Paul T. von Hippel,Joseph Workman,Douglas B. Downey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718801760

IF: 4.619

2018-09-27

Sociology of Education

Abstract:When do children become unequal in reading and math skills? Some research claims that inequality grows mainly before school begins. Some research claims that schools cause inequality to grow. And some research—including the 2004 study ‘‘Are Schools the Great Equalizer?’’—claims that inequality grows mainly during summer vacations. Unfortunately, the test scores used in the Great Equalizer study suffered from a measurement artifact that exaggerated estimates of inequality growth. In addition, the Great Equalizer study is dated and its participants are no longer school-aged. In this article, we replicate the Great Equalizer study using better test scores in both the original data and a newer cohort of children. When we use the new test scores, we find that variance is substantial at the start of kindergarten and does not grow but actually shrinks over the next two to three years. This finding, which was not evident in the original Great Equalizer study, implicates the years before kindergarten as the primary source of inequality in elementary reading and math. Total score variance grows during most summers and shrinks during most school years, suggesting that schools reduce inequality overall. Changes in inequality are small after kindergarten and do not replicate consistently across grades, subjects, or cohorts. That said, socioeconomic gaps tend to shrink during the school year and grow during the summer, while the black-white gap tends to follow the opposite pattern.

education & educational research,sociology
Reducing the Filtering Effect in Public School Admissions: A Bias-aware Analysis for Targeted Interventions

Yuri Faenza,Swati Gupta,Aapeli Vuorinen,Xuan Zhang

2024-07-16

Abstract:Problem definition: Traditionally, New York City's top 8 public schools have selected candidates solely based on their scores in the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT). These scores are known to be impacted by socioeconomic status of students and test preparation received in middle schools, leading to a massive filtering effect in the education pipeline. The classical mechanisms for assigning students to schools do not naturally address problems like school segregation and class diversity, which have worsened over the years. The scientific community, including policymakers, have reacted by incorporating group-specific quotas and proportionality constraints, with mixed results. The problem of finding effective and fair methods for broadening access to top-notch education is still unsolved. Methodology/results: We take an operations approach to the problem different from most established literature, with the goal of increasing opportunities for students with high economic needs. Using data from the Department of Education (DOE) in New York City, we show that there is a shift in the distribution of scores obtained by students that the DOE classifies as "disadvantaged" (following criteria mostly based on economic factors). We model this shift as a "bias" that results from an underestimation of the true potential of disadvantaged students. We analyze the impact this bias has on an assortative matching market. We show that centrally planned interventions can significantly reduce the impact of bias through scholarships or training, when they target the segment of disadvantaged students with average performance.

Computers and Society,Machine Learning
The Disparate Impacts of College Admissions Policies on Asian American Applicants

Joshua Grossman,Sabina Tomkins,Lindsay Page,Sharad Goel

2023-08-04

Abstract:There is debate over whether Asian American students are admitted to selective colleges and universities at lower rates than white students with similar academic qualifications. However, there have been few empirical investigations of this issue, in large part due to a dearth of data. Here we present the results from analyzing 685,709 applications from Asian American and white students to a subset of selective U.S. institutions over five application cycles, beginning with the 2015-2016 cycle. The dataset does not include admissions decisions, and so we construct a proxy based in part on enrollment choices. Based on this proxy, we estimate the odds that Asian American applicants were admitted to at least one of the schools we consider were 28% lower than the odds for white students with similar test scores, grade-point averages, and extracurricular activities. The gap was particularly pronounced for students of South Asian descent (49% lower odds). We trace this pattern in part to two factors. First, many selective colleges openly give preference to the children of alumni, and we find that white applicants were substantially more likely to have such legacy status than Asian applicants, especially South Asian applicants. Second, after adjusting for observed student characteristics, the institutions we consider appear less likely to admit students from geographic regions with relatively high shares of applicants who are Asian. We hope these results inform ongoing discussions on the equity of college admissions policies.

Computers and Society
Racial Differences in Teacher Perception of Student Ability

Elizabeth Covay Minor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601004

2014-10-01

Abstract:Background/Context Past research has examined many factors that contribute to the black– white achievement gap. While researchers have shown that teacher perceptions of students’ academic ability is an important contributing factor to the gap, little research has explored the extent to which teacher perceptions of students’ academic ability are sustained over time or the extent to which teacher ratings of students’ social and behavioral skills are related to their perceptions of academic ability. The current study focuses on whether teacher perceptions of students’ academic ability and social and behavioral skills differ by student race and the extent to which ratings at the beginning of the school year explain racial differences in perceptions of academic ability at the end of the year. Purpose There are two research questions addressed in this study: (1) To what extent do kindergarten teachers rate black and white students’ academic ability and social and behavioral skills differently? And (2) to what extent do test scores, fall teacher perceptions of students’ academic ability, and social and behavioral skills explain racial differences in teacher evaluations of students’ academic ability in the spring of kindergarten Population This study uses the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998–1999 (ECLS-K) kindergarten fall and spring data. The analytic sample used in this study includes students who were in both kindergarten waves with the same teacher and who were identified as black (2,494) or white (9,891) as reported by their parents Research Design This is a quasi-experimental study that uses two data points from kindergarten (fall and spring). Mean differences are used to answer the first research question, and teacher fixed-effects models are used to address the second research question. Conclusions/Recommendations This study finds that teachers perceived black students to have lower academic ability in fall and spring of kindergarten compared to white students as well as lower levels of social and behavioral skills. Teachers’ fall perceptions have lasting implications for how teachers perceive their students in the spring, and this appears to have more negative consequences for black students. Teacher reports of social and behavioral skills are more important for teacher perceptions of student ability for black students than for white students. In other words, behaving well for black students has a larger influence on teacher perceptions of students’ academic ability than it does for white students.
The Implementation, Flexibility and Reasonable Selection of Bonus-Point Policy for Minority Candidates in College Entrance Examination from the Perspective of Educational Equality

Jianming Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210527.015

2021-06-01

Abstract:Preferential policy that awards bonus points in national college entrance examination for ethnic students is nothing new. Thanks to such preferential means as bonus point or score deduction, the policy favors ethnic minorities as for the distribution of educational resources, thus endowing them with equal access to educational opportunities. However, the specific implementation of such policy varies. Among them, the execution plan based on specific "identity" and "culture" has inadvertently spawned issues such as "reverse discrimination" and "ethnic inequality". The research results reveal that bonus-point policy based on "region" serves as the best to maximize benefits and promote ethnic equality and unity.

Computer Science,Education,Political Science
The Consequences of Structural Racism on MCAT Scores and Medical School Admissions: The Past Is Prologue

Catherine Reinis Lucey,Aaron Saguil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002939

Abstract:Those in medical education have a responsibility to prepare a physician workforce that can serve increasingly diverse communities, encourage healthy changes in patients, and advocate for the social changes needed to advance the health of all. The authors of this Perspective discuss many of the likely causes of the observed differences in mean Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores between students from groups well represented in medicine and those from groups underrepresented in medicine. The lower mean MCAT scores of underrepresented groups can present challenges to diversifying the physician workforce if medical schools only admit those applicants with the highest MCAT scores. The authors review the psychometric literature, which showed no evidence of bias in the exam, and note that the differences in mean MCAT scores between racial and ethnic groups are similar to those in other measures of academic achievement and performance on high-stakes tests.The authors then describe the ways in which structural racism in the United States has contributed to differences in achievement for underrepresented students compared with well-represented students. These differences are not due to differences in aptitude but to differences in opportunities. The authors describe the widespread consequences of structural racism on economic success, educational opportunity, and bias in the educational environment. They close with 3 recommendations for medical schools that may mitigate the consequences of structural racism while maintaining academic standards and admitting students likely to succeed. Adopting these recommendations may help the medical profession build the diverse physician workforce needed to serve communities today.
Racial bias toward children in the early childhood education setting

Emma A Blackson,Marsha Gerdes,Ellie Segan,Crystal Anokam,Tiffani J Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221087051

2022-04-15

Journal of Early Childhood Research

Abstract:Journal of Early Childhood Research, Ahead of Print. Racial disparities in the education setting are well-documented, including suspensions and expulsion for Black children beginning in pre-school. Racial bias has been hypothesized as a factor contributing to these disparities. However, little is known about the racial attitudes that childcare educators and staff have toward children. To describe levels of implicit and explicit racial bias toward children among early childhood educators, we measured implicit pro-White/anti-Black racial bias of teachers and staff from three urban childcare centers using the Child Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Explicit bias was measured using a racial preference scale. Of the 48 participants in this sample, 56% were White, 29% Black, and 10% Hispanic. Although 21% (n = 10) of participants had no racial bias on the Child Race IAT, most had implicit pro-White bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 29%and 60%). The remaining participants had implicit pro-Black bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 9%and 19%). In contrast, 95% of participants reported no having no explicit racial preferences toward White or Black children. Additionally, we asked participants about perceptions, knowledge, and beliefs about sources of early childhood disparities. Knowledge of bias can be used in developing strategies to mitigate bias and reduce disparities in childcare settings.
Algorithms for College Admissions Decision Support: Impacts of Policy Change and Inherent Variability

Jinsook Lee,Emma Harvey,Joyce Zhou,Nikhil Garg,Thorsten Joachims,Rene F. Kizilcec

2024-06-24

Abstract:Each year, selective American colleges sort through tens of thousands of applications to identify a first-year class that displays both academic merit and diversity. In the 2023-2024 admissions cycle, these colleges faced unprecedented challenges. First, the number of applications has been steadily growing. Second, test-optional policies that have remained in place since the COVID-19 pandemic limit access to key information historically predictive of academic success. Most recently, longstanding debates over affirmative action culminated in the Supreme Court banning race-conscious admissions. Colleges have explored machine learning (ML) models to address the issues of scale and missing test scores, often via ranking algorithms intended to focus on 'top' applicants. However, the Court's ruling will force changes to these models, which were able to consider race as a factor in ranking. There is currently a poor understanding of how these mandated changes will shape applicant ranking algorithms, and, by extension, admitted classes. We seek to address this by quantifying the impact of different admission policies on the applications prioritized for review. We show that removing race data from a developed applicant ranking algorithm reduces the diversity of the top-ranked pool without meaningfully increasing the academic merit of that pool. We contextualize this impact by showing that excluding data on applicant race has a greater impact than excluding other potentially informative variables like intended majors. Finally, we measure the impact of policy change on individuals by comparing the arbitrariness in applicant rank attributable to policy change to the arbitrariness attributable to randomness. We find that any given policy has a high degree of arbitrariness and that removing race data from the ranking algorithm increases arbitrariness in outcomes for most applicants.

Computers and Society
Changing Course: Understanding the Legal Landscape of Race-Conscious Admission Practices and Implications to Diversity-Promoting Strategies in Higher Education

Diana T Noller,Angela Bañuelas,Shannon Diallo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000573

2024-03-01

Abstract:The 2023 US Supreme Court holding in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, et al. has changed the landscape in higher education admissions processes by declaring affirmative action unlawful. It is imperative that those working in higher education admissions understand the ruling and implement contemporary best practices. Institutions of higher education who wish to promote student diversity are tasked with developing alternative strategies to affirmative action and must steer clear from using race as a determinant factor in admissions decisions. Aiming to identify diversity in individuals' lived experiences, focusing on recruitment efforts that organically lead to diverse applicants, adopting holistic, mission-driven admissions processes, and enhancing robust retention efforts may be effective means of fostering student diversity.

The Black-White Test Score Gap

Affirmative Action and Precollege Human Capital

School accountability and the black-white test score gap

Why test? Talent loss and enrollment loss

Assessing the Potential Impact of a Nationwide Class-Based Affirmative Action System

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Can Desegregation Close the Racial Gap in High School Coursework?

Diverging Disparities: Race, Parental Income, and Children’s Math Scores, 1960 to 2009

Explicit vs. statistical targeting in affirmative action: Theory and evidence from Chicago's exam schools

Early Life Environment and Racial Inequality in Education and Earnings in the United States

Privileges, Immunities, and Affirmative Action in Medical Education

White Attitudes toward Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action

Inequality in Reading and Math Skills Forms Mainly before Kindergarten: A Replication, and Partial Correction, of “Are Schools the Great Equalizer?”

Reducing the Filtering Effect in Public School Admissions: A Bias-aware Analysis for Targeted Interventions

The Disparate Impacts of College Admissions Policies on Asian American Applicants

Racial Differences in Teacher Perception of Student Ability

The Implementation, Flexibility and Reasonable Selection of Bonus-Point Policy for Minority Candidates in College Entrance Examination from the Perspective of Educational Equality

The Consequences of Structural Racism on MCAT Scores and Medical School Admissions: The Past Is Prologue

Racial bias toward children in the early childhood education setting

Algorithms for College Admissions Decision Support: Impacts of Policy Change and Inherent Variability

Changing Course: Understanding the Legal Landscape of Race-Conscious Admission Practices and Implications to Diversity-Promoting Strategies in Higher Education