Genomic analysis of the lectotype specimens of European Ulva rigida and Ulva lacinulata (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) reveals the ongoing misapplication of names

Jeffery R. Hughey,Paul W. Gabrielson,Christine A. Maggs,Frédéric Mineur
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2021.1914862
2021-06-08
European Journal of Phycology
Abstract:<span>Species of <i>Ulva</i> Linnaeus are nearly impossible to identify using morpho-anatomy due to their simple thallus structure and phenotypic plasticity. The current solution to this problem is to sequence DNA from field-collected specimens and match these sequences to those available in public DNA databases. However, because type specimens of many species have not been sequenced, the accuracy of these identifications is highly doubtful. <i>Ulva rigida</i> C.Agardh is reported to be one of the most widespread and ecologically important <i>Ulva</i> species, but these records are based on either morpho-anatomy or, more recently, on DNA sequences. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) was performed on the lectotype specimen of <i>U. rigida</i> from Cádiz, Spain to determine the correct application of the name. The analysis yielded its complete plastid genome. <i>rbc</i>L, <i>tuf</i>A and ITS sequences from the lectotype specimen differed at the species level from all <i>U. rigida</i> sequences deposited in public databases. Instead, the lectotype sequences of <i>U. rigida</i> were identical or very similar to sequences identified as <i>U. rotundata</i> Bliding (referred to by some as <i>U. pseudorotundata</i> Cormaci, G.Furnari &amp; Alongi) from Ireland and Portugal, but not to the holotype of <i>U. rotundata</i> from Italy, which was identical to <i>U. lactuca</i> L. HTS of the lectotype of <i>U. lacinulata</i> (Kützing) Wittrock from Lesina, Croatia, a species morphologically similar to <i>U. rigida</i> with macroscopic marginal teeth, also yielded a complete plastid genome, with sequences identical or highly similar to GenBank <i>U. armoricana</i> Dion, Reviers &amp; Coat, <i>U</i>. '<i>laetevirens</i>', <i>U</i>. '<i>rigida</i>' and <i>U. scandinavica</i> Bliding. Since <i>U. lacinulata</i> is the oldest validly published name, it is the correct one to apply to the globally distributed species that was previously but incorrectly known as <i>U. rigida</i>. Based on this genetic evidence, <i>U. rigida</i> is restricted to European waters and confirmed by DNA sequences from Ireland, Portugal and Spain. This analysis shows that many barcode species identifications and taxonomic conclusions in the genus <i>Ulva</i> are incorrect.<b>Highlights</b><i>Ulva rigida</i> was misapplied and is restricted to Atlantic Europe.<i>Ulva lacinulata</i> is the dentate species of <i>Ulva</i> distributed worldwide.<i>Ulva rotundata</i> is a heterotypic synonym of <i>U. lactuca.</i></span>
plant sciences,marine & freshwater biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?