Abstract:Introduction Children younger than 4 years old often have difficulties in understanding others' mental states(e.g.,beliefs).One explanation for these difficulties is what is referred to as "the curse of knowledge" or a tendency to be biased by one's own knowledge when appreciating an ignorant perspective.It is different from egocentric bias in that the curse of knowledge is asymmetric.The present study aimed to investigate the characteristics of the curse of knowledge in different tasks(knowledge-attribution and desire-attribution) and,particularly,to identify whether there is also an asymmetric bias in children's desire for understanding. Method Two experiments were conducted based on 108 participating children ages 3 to 5 years old.In Experiment 1,a knowledge-attribution task was administered to these children.The children were asked to judge whether a puppet would know what was in a container(a box or an envelope),with which the children were either familiar or unfamiliar.Two conditions for children's knowledge were designed.One was that children were knowledgeable of what was inside the container.The other condition was that children were unknowledgeable.In Experiment 2,a desire-attribution task was administered.The children were told of presents a puppet liked or disliked and were asked to choose a present for the puppet according to its likes and dislikes. Results The results showed that children demonstrated an egocentric bias in the knowledge-attribution task.When the children themselves were knowledgeable of the contents inside the container,they tended to overestimate the puppet's knowledge of it.However,when the children were ignorant of the contents,they tended to underestimate the puppet's knowledge.In contrast,children demonstrated an asymmetric bias in the desire-attribution task.Younger children at the age of 3 tended to assume their own favorite as that of the puppet's even though the reality was otherwise.However,all participating children made much more successful inferences when their own preferences did not interfere. Discussion and conclusion The inconsistent findings in the two tasks might result from the differences of the task requirements and the contradiction between children and the character in the tasks.In the knowledge-attribution task,the conflict between children and the character was the only knowledge state about the reality.However,in the desire-attribution task,the conflict involved the desire.Because knowledge state was a kind of neutral state,whereas desire involved emotion,the degree of conflict differed between the two tasks.Furthermore,desire-attribution might require much more cognitive control to inhibit one's own preference,which might be related to the asymmetric bias.Thus,in contexts requiring less cognitive control,children tended to be able to take others' perspective much more easily than in a more conflicting context.In conclusion,the results suggest that perspective bias in younger children' s mental state reasoning is context specific.

How Does Narrative Cue Children's Perspective Taking?

Is Working Memory Necessary for Both Selection and Calculation in Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking? Evidence from Children and Adults

Linguistic Cues Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Belief-Reporting Sentences

Narrative Construction, Social Perceptions, and the Situation Model

Perspective-taking and social inferences in adolescents, young adults, and older adults.

Reading Fictional Narratives to Improve Social and Moral Cognition: The Influence of Narrative Perspective, Transportation, and Identification

The concept of narrative in children's writing

Cooperation Turns Preschoolers into Flexible Perspective Takers

The Perspective Bias in Children's Mental-State Reasoning

The Development of Narrative Discourse in French by 5 to 10 Years Old Children: Some Insights from a Conversational Interaction Method

Theory of mind and language of mind in narratives: Developmental trends from kindergarten to primary school

3 to 5 Years Old Children's Behavioral and Verbal Performances in Level 1 Perspective-Taking

Children's Demonstrative Comprehension and the Role of Non-linguistic Cognitive Abilities: A Cross-Linguistic Study

Use of abstracts, orientations, and codas in narration by language-disordered and nondisordered children

3 to 5 Years Old Children’s Behavioral and Verbal Performances in Level 1 Perspective-Taking: 3 to 5 Years Old Children’s Behavioral and Verbal Performances in Level 1 Perspective-Taking

The who, when and where of early narratives

Perspective Taking: Training Procedures in Developmentally Typical Preschoolers. Different Intervention Methods and Their Effectiveness

Neural correlates involved in perspective-taking in early childhood

Children’s Narrative Elaboration After Reading a Storybook Versus Viewing a Video

Preschoolers' comprehension of goal structure in narratives

Changing the Narrative Perspective: From Deictic to Anaphoric Point of View