Abstract:Introduction enterprises have been rapidly expanding their business footprints in Africa. The bi-lateral trade volume between China and Africa has risen from US $29.5 billion in 2004 to US $221.67 billion in 2014, representing an average growth rate of 30 percent per year. China has become Africa's largest trade partner. The foreign direct investment (FDI) stock from mainland China to Africa reached US$32.35 billion in 2014, over thirty-five times more than the figure merely ten years ago. (1) According to China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)'s registration database, there were more than 3000 enterprises operating in Africa as of January 2015. (2) With this backdrop of intensifying economic interaction, public opinions and media have paid special attention to the employment practices of companies in Africa. Much of this publicity is negative. Some observers express concerns--that companies prefer to bring a large number of workers to Africa and are unwilling to hire local (3) Ben Schiller reported that tens of thousands of laborers and engineers were imported to build infrastructure projects in Ethiopia, Sudan and other African countries. This makes the acute unemployment problem in Africa even worse. (4) Others complain about low wages. The International Trade Union Confederation's Hong Kong Liaison Office (IHLO) suggested that companies' wage is among the lowest in many African countries and they usually pay less than other foreign investors. (5) Another criticism is that working conditions in enterprises are problematic, often involving health and safety hazards and long working hours. (6) For example, an explosion accident at the Beijing General Research Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (BGRIMM) 2005 killed 52 Zambian employees and provoked fierce resentment from the local community against the investors. (7) Finally, doubts are raised about companies' contribution to the development of the continent's human capital. A World Bank research paper states: Chinese firms tend to rely on their own low-cost labor and do not invest heavily in the training and education of African workers. (8) Southern Africa Resource Watch also stated that technology transfer to local people is not a feature of most investment. (9) However, most of these comments are based on individual experiences or scattered case studies. Systematic research in this area has been scarce. To what extent are these perceptions about companies' employment practice true? Can we map out a precise picture of employment patterns? Further, do employment patterns contribute to Africa's own development and benefit African workers? Or do enterprises rather exploit Africa's cheap labor and bring damage to local communities? Below, this paper begins with investigating the nature of companies' employment practices in Africa and explores the reasons behind these practices. Based on the findings, it tries to analyze the benefits and harms of the employment pattern. The paper proposes that the evaluation of an employment pattern should consider not only employers' or employees' direct interests, but also a country's comprehensive social, economic and cultural development. Yet, enterprises, African workers, local governments and other related parties have different views on the reality of these broad issues. These diverging ideas often lead to conflicts and cause damage to both enterprises and employees. In contrast, when and Africans understand each other's visions and adjust their positions to converge, the cooperation can sustain and bring benefits to both sides. Therefore, I argue that mutual learning is the key to realizing mutual beneficial employment practice. In order to present a comprehensive and precise picture, this article combines data collection with in-depth interviews and case studies. …

The interactions of a Chinese MNE with local institutions in sub-Sahara Africa and the implications for workforce management in the subsidiary

China in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for HRM Policy and Practice at Organizational Level

Does Chinese Employment Benefit Africans? Investigating Chinese Enterprises and Their Operations in Africa

The compound labor regime of Chinese construction projects in Ethiopia

A South-South perspective on emerging economy companies and institutional coevolution: An empirical study of Chinese multinationals in Africa

The challenges of Internationalisation of Chinese companies in Africa: A systematic review

Chinese Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa : New Dynamics, New Synergies

Effect of Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi on Supervisory Decisions in China: an Empirical Investigation

2.7 Working History: China, Africa, and Globalization

Adapting and sustaining operations in weak institutional environments: A business ecosystem assessment of a Chinese MNE in Central Africa

Will China Redefine Development Patterns in Africa? Evidence from Cameroon

The impact of institutional quality on Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa

Human resource management and industrial relations in multinational corporations in and from China: Challenges and new insights

At Africa's Expense? Disaggregating the Social Impact of Chinese Mining Operations

Overseas Chinese as expatriate managers in China: is their recruitment a solution to cross-cultural management problems for multinationals operating in China?

Still the Dark Continent? Towards contextual methodological approaches to management development research in foreign multinational firms in Africa

Time Perception and Industrialization: Divergence and Convergence of Work Ethics in Chinese Enterprises in Africa

Local Skill Development from China’s Engagement in Africa: Comparative Evidence from the Construction Sector in Ghana

Global configurations in multinational enterprises, duality, and the challenge of LGBT inclusivity in unsympathetic host countries within Africa

On Development Strategies for Improving the Management Level of Chinese Enterprises in Africa: the case of Chinese enterprises in Kenyan

Human resource management in Chinese multinationals in the United Kingdom: The interplay of institutions, culture, and strategic choice